Zad wroteBrahm_K wroteZad wroteBrahm_K wroteI'm hoping that whichever one loses will take the other as their vice president.
If they were intelligent, they'd have done that from the start...
I actually disagree on this one. Both want to be president- no harm in that, and both have pretty equal support. If one were to say that he/she is willing to be the other's vice president, then they lose support, because a vote for one might as well just be a vote for the other. But yes- lets hope they are intelligent enough to unify the party by allowing the loser to be VP.
Meh, I think the two of them unified wouldn't do so badly, especially if they presented it as a partnership instead of Pres/V-P. They've definately lost face with all the attacks on each other...
Yep, there's no question that both have been very immature about it- its just such grade 6 behaviour. At least in the US, debates are moderated, whereas here in Canada, a debate is just a four way shouting match between four idiots.
And you bring up a very interesting idea.. a presidential partnership. Why does there only need to be one president? Why not two people in cooperation? Unfortunately, given the complete breakdown of any sense in the US electorate system (most notably, the two party system), I don't think we'll be getting any constitutional reforms soon.
