Bruce_Bitenfils wroteDev, just a thought for next year. How about this for the roster size/composition:- if 8 teams: 2C, 2LW, 2RW, 4D, 2G, 1Util, 10BN, 2IR (23 active players/roster + 2IR)- if 10 teams: 2C, 2LW, 2RW, 4D, 2G, 1U, 6BN, 2IR (19 active players/roster + 2IR)- if 12 teams: 1C, 1LW, 1RW, 2D, 1G, 1U, 9BN, 2IR (16 active players/roster + 2IR)That way you really often would have decisions to make, especially big days like Saturdays (who's to play and who's to sit tonight). Right now you seldom have choices to make. Just my 2 cents.
That's a lot of benched players to have going into every night. This is only my 3rd year doing hockey pools, but in my experience, the set-up we have now works best. Unless somebody with a little more experience has something to say, I'd like to keep it the way it is and make only minor tweaks to it. If everybody agrees to make such a big change, then I guess it can be implemented somehow. But me personally, I like it the way it is.