Goat wrote:
Presumably shotguns also make massive holes in your walls and any family members who happen to be close by, right? Let's be reasonable here; I'm not Rio or Traptunderice, I am in favour of property rights, but I don't happen to believe that trespassing deserves a death sentence, and I think burglars whacked out on crack need time in rehab rather than getting shot. Call me a softie, but shooting them and putting them in a prison system full of drugs will only make them worse criminals than better members of society. Plus, I'm not prepared to risk my life by getting in a shootout with a crackhead to defend my stereo system, considering I'm insured and can just buy another.
And again, you're confusing small-state politics, liberalism, with big-state politics, socialism. Pretend I'm a libertarian, if that helps. I'm coming from a centrist viewpoint rather than what you think of as leftist, here - government shouldn't help people out who are capable of helping themselves. Universal benefits are bad. I agree. But some social programs are needed to help the genuinely worthy.
Like I said, a warning blast is intimidating enough (usually) and if not, well, if you are in my home in the dead of night, then you are up to no good. And with a wife and kids, you're damn right I'm gonna shoot first and ask questions later.
Obviously, I am not idiotic enough to point a gun in the general direction of my family (at any rate, they would not be idiotic enough to get in front of it).
Holes can be patched; I am not concerned with a hole in my wall, you dig?
I think you know what I am talking about when I say that liberals (in America, I will reserve commentary on foreign politics for those that are savvy in them) want more government, hence less self-reliance; you can connect the dots, surely.