cry of the banshee wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
I'm not diverting. I'm just saying that private contractors have done awful, awful things in Iraq and Afghanistan. The two examples I know off my head is awful treatment of workers and the exclusion of people into contained ghettos or slums. Yet sex trafficking, not wholesale slaughter of the innocent and countless other accounts of human rights violation, is what will get media attention. Our own soldiers put another soldier in a cargo container to rape her; imagine what these companies, without any form of accountability keeping them in check, are doing to a people with no way of voicing the atrocities they suffer under.
The things that you are speaking of, these atrocities and human rights violations, are not exclusive to these private contractors or our own soldiers (I would imagine that there are bad apples in our military, but by and large civilian abuses are kept to a minimun).
That's the issue I'm trying to point out. Now that most operations are done by private corporations, abuses have skyrocketed and there are no forms of accountability.
Quote:
At any rate, there is a big difference between buying, selling and raping children and "containing" people in slums, or "awful" working conditions. If you are referring to those things in relation to the States, well, the working conditions are far from "awful" and nobody is being "contained" in slums. Now if you are referring to those situations as they may be in Afghanistan, Iraq, etc. well, that is their problem, really.
Umm I was only referring to Afghanistan and Iraq. I would say demarcating people into areas where there aren't enough supplies for them to live off of while using them for practically slave labor to rebuild the buildings which we destroyed is pretty fucked up. If you don't think that putting people into slums which are regulated by private paramilitary forces leads to higher rates of rape and prostitution then yeah I guess you wouldn't see how awful work conditions can be worse than sex trafficking. "Their problem"? The whole point of what I was saying is that we are fucking doing this to them when our tax dollars funds these companies to go overseas and do this to them. Slavery is the slave's problem not the overseer's.

Quote:
Did DynCorp knowingly engage in human, child trafficking or did the money they funded the so called party with go unknowingly (or known after the fact) towards these things?
That's the issue, though, they may not even be aware of what their budget goes towards because there are no forms of accountability. Even if this company is completely innocent and it was the fault of the party-goers misusing funds, there are no ways of holding the company accountable for how their money is spent insofar as their contract is to the govt and not the American people.
Quote:
And, if so, do the swine in DC have any knowledge of this, and if they do, what in the hell are they funding them for?
I'd be curious to see which members of the Senate and House have monetary connections to DynCorp? Either way there are no repercussions to be had for immoral private contractors.