Metal Reviews
https://metalreviews.com/phpBB/

Oversensitive windbag sues crazy wierdo over a flamewar
https://metalreviews.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=5711
Page 1 of 1

Author:  rio [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 1:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Oversensitive windbag sues crazy wierdo over a flamewar

http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/story/0,,1737445,00.html

Hehe, I'll think twice before calling someone a "lard brain" over teh internets again.

Author:  Radagast [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 1:52 pm ]
Post subject: 

People really suck.

Author:  Goat [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 2:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oversensitive windbag sues crazy wierdo over a flamewar

rio wrote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/story/0,,1737445,00.html

Hehe, I'll think twice before calling someone a "lard brain" over teh internets again.


That was ridiculous. Did you see the comments at the bottom? :D

Author:  rio [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oversensitive windbag sues crazy wierdo over a flamewar

Zad wrote:
rio wrote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/story/0,,1737445,00.html

Hehe, I'll think twice before calling someone a "lard brain" over teh internets again.


That was ridiculous. Did you see the comments at the bottom? :D


I didn't notice any comments, Zad you nonce.

*trembles in fear*

Author:  Goat [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oversensitive windbag sues crazy wierdo over a flamewar

rio wrote:
Zad wrote:
rio wrote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/story/0,,1737445,00.html

Hehe, I'll think twice before calling someone a "lard brain" over teh internets again.


That was ridiculous. Did you see the comments at the bottom? :D


I didn't notice any comments, Zad you nonce.

*trembles in fear*


Expect my lawyers.

Errrm...wrong link.

Meant here:
http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/archiv ... amned.html

Author:  rio [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oversensitive windbag sues crazy wierdo over a flamewar

Zad wrote:
rio wrote:
Zad wrote:
rio wrote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/story/0,,1737445,00.html

Hehe, I'll think twice before calling someone a "lard brain" over teh internets again.


That was ridiculous. Did you see the comments at the bottom? :D


I didn't notice any comments, Zad you nonce.

*trembles in fear*


Expect my lawyers.

Errrm...wrong link.

Meant here:
http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/archiv ... amned.html


Huzzah for the small number of sense talking Guardian readers!

http://www.bigdaddymerk.co.uk/mailwatch/?m=200603

I love British newspapers. Was Diana murdered by Asylum seekers to bring down house prices in Kent? It's political correctness gone mad!

Author:  Goat [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oversensitive windbag sues crazy wierdo over a flamewar

rio wrote:
Zad wrote:
rio wrote:
Zad wrote:
rio wrote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/story/0,,1737445,00.html

Hehe, I'll think twice before calling someone a "lard brain" over teh internets again.


That was ridiculous. Did you see the comments at the bottom? :D


I didn't notice any comments, Zad you nonce.

*trembles in fear*


Expect my lawyers.

Errrm...wrong link.

Meant here:
http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/archiv ... amned.html


Huzzah for the small number of sense talking Guardian readers!

http://www.bigdaddymerk.co.uk/mailwatch/?m=200603

I love British newspapers. Was Diana murdered by Asylum seekers to bring down house prices in Kent? It's political correctness gone mad!


:lol: I didn't know about that. Great, I'll have to join up...

Author:  Radagast [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oversensitive windbag sues crazy wierdo over a flamewar

rio wrote:
Was Diana murdered by Asylum seekers to bring down house prices in Kent? It's political correctness gone mad!

My gut tells me probably.

Author:  Eternal Idol [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 4:47 pm ]
Post subject: 

Di was murdered no doubt.

Author:  Radagast [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:16 pm ]
Post subject: 

Eternal Idol wrote:
Di was murdered no doubt.

Har har, you're out of the loop on this one, my non-British friend.

Author:  Eternal Idol [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:19 pm ]
Post subject: 

Radagast wrote:
Eternal Idol wrote:
Di was murdered no doubt.

Har har, you're out of the loop on this one, my non-British friend.


The paparazzi was a scapegoat, that much I'm sure. Care to enlighten me.

Author:  Radagast [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:44 pm ]
Post subject: 

We're only talking about it here because the Daily Express (right wing British middle-class tabloid) has spent the 10 years since the poor bint bought it plugging a new conspiract theory on the subject on at least 2 of their 7 front pages per week.

SHOCKING NEW EVIDINCE ON DIANA DEATH

DIANA DEATH DRIVER NOT DRUNK

LIES EXPOSED OVER DIANA

MI6 "WANTED DIANA DEAD"
SHOCKING NEW TESTIMONY UNCOVERED

FRENCH COPS COVERED UP DIANA AUTOPSY

etc

For 10 damn years.

Author:  Eternal Idol [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:54 pm ]
Post subject: 

Radagast wrote:
We're only talking about it here because the Daily Express (right wing British middle-class tabloid) has spent the 10 years since the poor bint bought it plugging a new conspiract theory on the subject on at least 2 of their 7 front pages per week.

SHOCKING NEW EVIDINCE ON DIANA DEATH

DIANA DEATH DRIVER NOT DRUNK

LIES EXPOSED OVER DIANA

MI6 "WANTED DIANA DEAD"
SHOCKING NEW TESTIMONY UNCOVERED

FRENCH COPS COVERED UP DIANA AUTOPSY

etc

For 10 damn years.


Ah, gotcha. 9/11 is starting to get that way over here.

Author:  Orion [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 6:37 pm ]
Post subject: 

I wonder what percentage of lawsuits are actually for valid and somewhat reasonable reasons. There are obviously examples of where you have every right to bring a lawsuit ( medical malpractice and such) but all these random dumbshit cases really seem to be taking over.

Author:  CĂș Chulainn [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 7:00 pm ]
Post subject: 

Quote:
rio wrote:
Zad wrote:
rio wrote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/story/0,,1737445,00.html

Hehe, I'll think twice before calling someone a "lard brain" over teh internets again.


That was ridiculous. Did you see the comments at the bottom?


I didn't notice any comments, Zad you nonce.

*trembles in fear*


Expect my lawyers.

Errrm...wrong link.

Meant here:
http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/archiv ... amned.html



haha the quotes were funny. but seriously, what a fucked-up bush supporter... calling an anti-war person a nazi... that's wierd...

Author:  Eternal Idol [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 8:34 pm ]
Post subject: 

Imagine that. Something completely idiotic surfaces from a Conservative Political Discussion? Didn't see that coming.

Author:  Kathaarian [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:33 pm ]
Post subject: 

Radagast wrote:
That very offensive sig


Your sig is offensive. I'm calling my lawyer.

Author:  Eternal Idol [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:37 pm ]
Post subject: 

Kathaarian wrote:
Radagast wrote:
That very offensive sig


Your sig is offensive. I'm calling my lawyer.


I'd say that offense is worth about $20,000.

Author:  Kathaarian [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:39 pm ]
Post subject: 

Eternal Idol wrote:
Kathaarian wrote:
Radagast wrote:
That very offensive sig


Your sig is offensive. I'm calling my lawyer.


I'd say that offense is worth about $20,000.


Just enough to modify my car.

Author:  NewFriendAncientEnemy [ Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:42 pm ]
Post subject: 

I AM NOT an oversensitive windbag~!

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC + 1 hour
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/