Metal Reviews
https://metalreviews.com/phpBB/

paul mccartney's wife in porn
https://metalreviews.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6404		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  Anonymous [ Mon Jun 05, 2006 1:27 pm ]
Post subject:  paul mccartney's wife in porn
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006250730,00.html


LADY Heather McCartney posed in depraved pornographic clinches which are bound to sicken her estranged husband Sir Paul and his army of fans.

The ex-model was snapped in a string of lurid scenes for a hard core German book.
Author:  Anonymous [ Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:06 pm ]
Post subject: 
Fuck British tabloids.
Author:  Goat [ Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:41 pm ]
Post subject: 
I love how they always describe themselves as a 'family newspaper'.

Otherwise:

Slayer Of Kings wrote:
Fuck British tabloids.
Author:  Tlaloc [ Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:53 pm ]
Post subject: 
I like all the adjectives they use; (sickening, filthy, depraved). I bet the journo wrote the article prior to having a good wholesome fap over the pictures.
Author:  Eternal Idol [ Mon Jun 05, 2006 3:31 pm ]
Post subject: 
Mmmmmmmmmmmm! Amputee porn!
Author:  Lord Jotun [ Mon Jun 05, 2006 3:57 pm ]
Post subject: 
Sir Wanksalot wrote:
I bet the journo wrote the article prior to having a good wholesome fap over the pictures.


Guaranteed.
Author:  Azrael [ Mon Jun 05, 2006 8:17 pm ]
Post subject: 
isn't the sun the one with the page 3 or 6 or something girls?

tabloids suck, we have some really shitty ones too, with news on low-life socialites and their shitty marriages and shit.
Author:  Goat [ Mon Jun 05, 2006 8:19 pm ]
Post subject: 
Azrael wrote:
isn't the sun the one with the page 3 or 6 or something girls?


Yeah, amongst others.
Author:  Eyesore [ Mon Jun 05, 2006 9:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: paul mccartney's wife in porn
flying_guitars wrote:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006250730,00.html


LADY Heather McCartney posed in depraved pornographic clinches which are bound to sicken her estranged husband Sir Paul and his army of fans.

The ex-model was snapped in a string of lurid scenes for a hard core German book.

Dude! Is it so fucking hard for some of you to post warnings? You think that's a good site to visit while at work, at a library, at your mom's house? WTF?

I think we should start suspending accounts for two weeks when this shit happens.
Author:  Dead Machine [ Mon Jun 05, 2006 9:59 pm ]
Post subject: 
...not in this case. The title said 'Porn.'
Author:  Eyesore [ Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:30 pm ]
Post subject: 
Dead Machine wrote:
...not in this case. The title said 'Porn.'

That means nothing, the link says "article" not pornographic photos. There is nothing there that suggests it's not safe for work. I can find articles about porn on CNN.
Author:  Dead Machine [ Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:37 pm ]
Post subject: 
Eyesore wrote:
Dead Machine wrote:
...not in this case. The title said 'Porn.'

That means nothing, the link says "article" not pornographic photos. There is nothing there that suggests it's not safe for work. I can find articles about porn on CNN.


Best to play it safe, dude.
Author:  Eyesore [ Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:39 pm ]
Post subject: 
Dead Machine wrote:
Eyesore wrote:
Dead Machine wrote:
...not in this case. The title said 'Porn.'

That means nothing, the link says "article" not pornographic photos. There is nothing there that suggests it's not safe for work. I can find articles about porn on CNN.

Best to play it safe, dude.

Come on, it's been asked far too many times, dude. If you post something like this affix a NSFW to it. If you click it then, too bad. The same thing happened at the boxing site I visit and people started getting their accounts suspended for it. Now it never happens.

A lot of you are young and don't understand the consequences associated with this shit. The least you could do is respect those that do and put up a warning.
Author:  rio [ Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:50 pm ]
Post subject: 
Excluding murderers, rapists etc, I honestly can't think of a group of people I have more contempt for than tabloid journalists. Especially British ones.
Author:  unknownkadath666 [ Tue Jun 06, 2006 12:07 am ]
Post subject: 
Im sitting on my computer in the living room with my grandmother and clicked that and it nearly poped up before i saw Eyesores coment. normaly i woudl say that "porn" was al the disclaimer you need but this time it seems like its just the article
Author:  Goat [ Tue Jun 06, 2006 10:03 am ]
Post subject: 
Eyesore wrote:
Dead Machine wrote:
Eyesore wrote:
Dead Machine wrote:
...not in this case. The title said 'Porn.'

That means nothing, the link says "article" not pornographic photos. There is nothing there that suggests it's not safe for work. I can find articles about porn on CNN.

Best to play it safe, dude.

Come on, it's been asked far too many times, dude. If you post something like this affix a NSFW to it. If you click it then, too bad. The same thing happened at the boxing site I visit and people started getting their accounts suspended for it. Now it never happens.

A lot of you are young and don't understand the consequences associated with this shit. The least you could do is respect those that do and put up a warning.


It is The Sun after all. We Brits don't just moan for nothing, you know. But you're right, really. Maybe add something to the rules thread about it, so people can't say they didn't know?
Author:  hellraiser_xes [ Sun Jun 11, 2006 9:17 am ]
Post subject: 
Quote:
Dressed in red stockings, suspenders and a corset — and with long red-painted nails — she looks like the madam of a sleazy brothel.


Maybe that's where he found her.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC + 1 hour
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/