Well, there's value in looking at this subject, as we have been, across all genres. But I think there's some value to looking at this stuff with a single genre in mind, too. Metal, for example.
As was said before, metal can only become so avant-garde and "free" before it literally becomes something else. On one hand, the genre is a limitation, but on the other hand it provides boundaries for artists to push - and that's usually when some of the best music is made.
Burzum might not be "free" compared to many artists and songwriters throughout all of music, but maybe it is for metal and that definately is saying something. Perhaps the more we pin metal (or any genre) down as being rigid and of little diversity, the more we can actually argue that the accomplishments and innovations within it are even more significant than we tend to first think.
This relates partly to what I said about timespan. When a genre is born, rules and boundaries are set. Some genres have more or stiffer ones than others, etc. Sometimes we can say, "well that's been done before in jazz (or blues or classical, etc.)". But in some cases, it's not like a metal artist has even heard any of that other music before. They're just creating and pushing as they desire given the knowledge and level they've achieved at that time given the material and confines they have to work with. ... I'm not trying to promote ignorance or mediocrity by any means, but I don't want to diminish or dismiss accomplishments for what they are either.
But again, I think we have been generally looking at the entire spectrum of music here...
Quote:
Your second point is also valid, but Misha did admit he likes to be a bit of a contrarian with his hypothetical post-rock idea, and I merely sought an admission from him on that.
Yeah, I understand and concur. I guess I just prefer bluntness over wishy washiness.
-Tyrion