Metal Reviews https://metalreviews.com/phpBB/ |
|
'85 or '86? https://metalreviews.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=12825 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | DevotedWalnut [ Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:34 am ] |
Post subject: | '85 or '86? |
1985: Bonded By Blood Hell Awaits To Mega Therion Killing is my Business...And Business is Good Spreading the Disease The Spectre Within Walls of Jericho Seven Churches Speak English or Die Metal Heart Fear of Tomorrow Infernal Overkill Power and Pain Feel the Fire Endless Pain Bestial Devestation The Return........ Skeptics Apocalypse We Have Arrived Long Live the Loud Power From Hell Executioners Song Evil Invaders vs. 1986: Reign in Blood Master of Puppets Peace Sells...But Who's Buying Among the Living Pleasure to Kill Darkness Descends Under the Sign of the Black Mark Awaken the Guardian Somewhere in Time Epicus Doomicus Metallicus Fatal Portrait The Dark Zombie Attack Game Over Doomsday for the Deceiver Eternal Devestaion Rrroooaaarrr Orgasmatron Morbid Visions Obssessed by Cruelty Strappado Beyond the Gates Ordered to Kill Convicted Unveiling the Wicked Possessed by Fire The Force Malicious Intent Torment in Fire Now those are big lists, (yes mostly thrash, get over it) and I am not expecting anybody to read each and every list, nor do I expect everybody to have heard each of those albums, but I want to know what year do you think was better for metal. 1985 or 1986. Both years were huge for thrash, plus it was the real early years of black and death metal. Not to mention all the kick ass straight up heavy metal. It is almost impossible for me to pick one of the two years, so I will wait to see what other people to say and see if I agree or disagree with them. Anyway, both years kicked ass. ![]() |
Author: | Lucifer's Son [ Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:20 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Yes yes, both years were great years for metal. I'd go with 1986 because there weren't any studio Iron Maiden in 1985. |
Author: | DevotedWalnut [ Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:22 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I knew Maiden would sway some votes... |
Author: | Lucifer's Son [ Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:24 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Well, they're an awesome band (at least were they in the 80s). ![]() Back then, a year without an Iron Maiden album was a sad year... ![]() |
Author: | DevotedWalnut [ Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:30 am ] |
Post subject: | |
They needed time to tour the world. At least in 1985 they started writing one of the best metal albums ever. |
Author: | Lucifer's Son [ Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:37 am ] |
Post subject: | |
DevotedWalnut wrote: They needed time to tour the world.
At least in 1985 they started writing one of the best metal albums ever. I still like the first four albums better than Somewhere in Time though. Ho, and, no Metallica album in 1985. Master of Puppets in 1986!!! ![]() |
Author: | DevotedWalnut [ Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:40 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Agreed on Maiden, somewhat. No comment on Metallica. |
Author: | Lucifer's Son [ Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:50 am ] |
Post subject: | |
And there were no Judas Priest album in 1985 either. I know Turbo's supposed to be a bad album but I still like it... ![]() |
Author: | DevotedWalnut [ Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:52 am ] |
Post subject: | |
No comme... (head exploded) |
Author: | Lucifer's Son [ Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:54 am ] |
Post subject: | |
![]() C'mon! It's not that bad... ![]() |
Author: | DevotedWalnut [ Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:57 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Not that good either. |
Author: | ganeshaRules [ Thu Feb 12, 2009 8:22 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Lucifer's Son wrote: Well, they're an awesome band (at least were they in the 80s).
![]() Back then, a year without an Iron Maiden album was a sad year... ![]() Live after death? Ok, it's a live album, but everybody back them was happy with it. I vote for 1985, but both were incredible years. |
Author: | Lucifer's Son [ Thu Feb 12, 2009 8:40 am ] |
Post subject: | |
ganeshaRules wrote: Lucifer's Son wrote: Well, they're an awesome band (at least were they in the 80s). ![]() Back then, a year without an Iron Maiden album was a sad year... ![]() Live after death? Ok, it's a live album, but everybody back them was happy with it. I vote for 1985, but both were incredible years. Yeah, it's a live album... Nothing like the excitement of having new songs from the band. |
Author: | DevotedWalnut [ Thu Feb 12, 2009 8:40 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Tough choice, but I ended up picking 1985. |
Author: | crast [ Thu Feb 12, 2009 8:58 am ] |
Post subject: | |
86 Mainly because when I got into metal, it was with a lot of the CDs from 86, and for some reason, not as many of the CDs from 85. Now from that list, I'd say that I regularly listen to about 0 of them, and occasionally perhaps 10 or so. .:crast:. |
Author: | DevotedWalnut [ Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:01 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Only 10!!???!?!?! I at least listen to, well too many to count. Almost all of them get continued spins for me. |
Author: | crast [ Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:09 am ] |
Post subject: | |
DevotedWalnut wrote: Only 10!!???!?!?!
I at least listen to, well too many to count. Almost all of them get continued spins for me. I'm a death metal kind of guy you know! I would guess that the CDs that spin the most for me are either from 92-96, or new shit. .:c:. |
Author: | Skeksis [ Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:22 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I'd probably go with 86, as there were more albums released that I like than in 85. |
Author: | showmaster [ Thu Feb 12, 2009 11:18 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Well, almost whole '86 list are my fav albums so... |
Author: | rio [ Thu Feb 12, 2009 12:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
86, but who would like to have to choose, really. |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC + 1 hour |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |