Tehom wrote:
emperorblackdoom wrote:
Tehom wrote:
emperorblackdoom wrote:
Good point, the new Evoken is more boring, and thus ought to have been reviewed according to your genre criterion.
Have you honestly even listened to it? Its as layered and varied as any of their past work, I honestly think you have no clue what you are talking about.
Of course I've listened to it. It is decent, solid funeral doom, but not as good as Antithesis of Light, or Quietus, nor does it attempt to do anything that the Giant does. You've listened to the Giant, right?
It sounds more like standard funeral doom album than the Giant, which according to your genre definition, would make it more boring.
Evoken have always been able to add multi-dimensional songwriting to their doom/death approach, note that I said Doom/death as opposed to the strictly atmospheric tendencies for bands like Thergothon and the usual names go for. Tracks such as Descent into Chaotic dream, Grim Eloquence, and the Unechoing dread are multi-layered with violins, spoken word vocals, and heavier riffs that are more akin to traditional doom death than you're average funeral doom band concerned with just making atmospheric music for the sake of it. I'm not sure what you mean by standard, I've never considered Evoken to be a funeral doom band. They were inspired by Disembowelment and maybe Thergothon, but they are a lot heavier than most of the bands typically listed as "funeral doom"/.
From earlier up in the thread, you said: "How do these guys get reviewed over the new Ea or Evoken is beyond me."
Ea is about as standard as funeral doom gets, I assumed you were comparing Evoken to them by contrasting them both with Ahab. Considering Evoken a funeral doom band seems pretty logical to me, as they were clearly inspired by Thergothon (the band's name a reference) and Disembowelment, but lets see what the band says.
I found an enlightening interview with one of the founding members, Nick Orlando:
http://nihilistic.voila.net/Interviews/evoken.htm
He lists the two above mentioned bands and cites early MDB but also notes: "Of course, back then it was not called 'Funeral Doom' it was just good ole' doom/death and that was that. The term 'Funeral Doom' came later and I believe it was started by the Red Stream descriptions of Skepticism in their ads."
And his favorite albums: "My personal cornerstone doom albums would be: Thergothon-Stream From the Heavens; Winter-Into Darkness; Paradise Lost-Lost Paradise & Gothic; My Dying Bride-Symphonnaire Infernus & As the Flower Withers; Disembowelment-Transcendence Into the Peripheral; Cathedral-Forest Of Equilibrium; Trouble-Psalm 9 & The Skull; Black Sabbath-First 6 Lps; Skepticism-Stormcrowfleet; Esoteric-The Pernicious Enigma; Anathema-Crestfallen; Decomposed-Hope Finally Died; etc etc..."
So anyway, to bring the topic somewhat back to point: it is interesting how Evoken viewed the genre in the early days as just doom/death. I'd argue it then evolved to something slower, less death oriented, and in some cases lighter, with Skepticism and their organs obviously have a huge influence. Is this new Ahab album going to be able to change the direction of the subgenre? I don't think is stays within the established genre enough to do that, but who knows.