Satan's Anus wrote:
How does that review justify a score of 70/100?

That score, for an album that you didn't even really discuss in the review (probably because you can't listen to it), and when you did, you said it was disappointing and that you'll rarely listen to it.
Yet a score that indicates it's three points away from perfection. Absurd.
From the Icarus Witch thread:
Quote:
If Mike Patton farts in a bottle and records it rolling down a hill, it's declared genius...because, for whatever reason, Patton is somehow regarded as being a great songwriter, which he's not.
Seriously, these threads are like right next to each other... So, is this site too complementary, or too harsh about Patton? Either way, we must be doing something wrong mustn't we, even if you can't work out what it is!
By the way, as you will know if you follow the site, 70 is actually a fairly low score indicating a pretty average album. Just the way levels seem to have settled over the years. In most music magazines etc. 6 is a pretty disappointing score, and this is only one point above that.