zadsterboombox wrote:
More crappy metalcore. And it is metal, as you yourself said in the KsE - EOH review, calling it "metallo-hardcore". It is metal, shallow and crap, as you said, but ultimately metal.
lol.. yeah i didn't have my lingo straight in that review it seems.
This may be one of those "is the glass half empty or half full" statements, but the reason why i don;t consider these bands true "metal" is for numerous reasons. First of all... the genre is an evolution from hardcore, and did so by adopting metal influences in the music. Why i bitch about them calling themselves metal is because the genre did not branch itself from earlier forms of metal like black, death, thrash...etc, but actually from punk music. essentially, my pessimistic view is that metalcore "happened" because a few bands were like:
Metalcore guy 1: "shit... it's only been about 15-20 years since hardcore has been around and we're already hitting dead ends with trying to come up with new and groundbreaking music. Hmm.. what shall we do? I've got it! lets add some metal influences in our music (since the two genres are quite alike) and that way we can continue being "original" for like another 5 years".
Metalcore guy 2: "what do we do after 5 years?"
Metalcore guy 1: "We move on to techno!"
The only way to prove my point would be to find an accurate definition of metal... and i'm not... cuz its more or less subjective and i'm not a philospher. But one thing I KNOW, is that metal doesn't try to be is something it isn't, it has no intention on being trendy, and it is all about the music which ultimately results in a strong sense of belonging and unity. Metalcore doesn't fullfill this though - party because it isn't derived from metal itself and it has different intentions. So to end my rant... although metalcore it "metal" per se... can you really call it Metal?
Rock on
Jason