traptunderice wrote:
The Annoying Frenchman wrote:
Any way you take it, it's a far better album than the latest of Slayer, Megadeth and Metallica. I agree Chuck is not the strong point of the group, he still does a decent enough work at worst.
Since when did washed up bands become the criterion of the success of other bands? By that standard, every album reviewed this week might be a 100. This album seems like a bunch of b-sides to Formation. Skolnick is badass as always, but I don't think that equates to the album as a whole being any good.
It just seems weird to rate this so highly when you couldn't get 30 minutes of decent music out of it when Vektor's last two albums have basically been four albums worth of material that are absolutely off the hook. I don't mean to compare apples and oranges, but honestly, those guys are what this thrash album should be being compared to, not dinosaurs, and in terms of energy and songwriting, Testament can't hold a candle to them. Enjoy mediocre music for the label stamped on it. Oh, and awful pun was intended. Did ya get the rise and up part of it?
</'death to sacred cows' rant>
You're obviously entitled to your opinion, but I kind of take offence at the "sacred cow" jab.
I can't speak for anybody else, but I like this album because it sounds good, not because I have made some sort of pact with myself to always enjoy Testament releases regardless of quality.
Now with that out of the way, I whole heartedly agree that Vektor completely shits all over Testament. But that's not saying a whole lot because Vektor are one of the best bands in the world at the moment. Testament are still good, but it's hard for any band to compare to Vektor right now. Besides, I'm not 100% sold on the direct comparison between them. Vektor is very much a progressive band, while Testament is straight-forward thrash. From the perspective of a big thrash fan, I think they actually scratch two different itches.
EDIT: funky haircut on that cow, stefan!