Metal Reviews

You're welcome to comment on:


Click here to see the review.

Listen up, fuckers! This is a great, underrated 80's rock album that just came a bit too late and missed the boat. Chris has obviously gotten much better at reviewing, too.

I don't understand why this is listed as a classic considering it flew under everyones' radar and considering how hugely popular the self-titled and In The Heart Of The Young were, surely if any Winger album was to be deemed a classic it would be one of those two?

Either way, it's a great album. Reb Beach is on guitar on this album and it's much heavier than the previous two Winger albums. Definitely worth a listen if you like this sort of thang!

Here's some clips:

BLIND REVOLUTION MAD
JUNKYARD DOG (TEARS ON STONE)
SPELL I'M UNDER (a ballad, but one of the best I've ever heard)

WHY THE FUCK IS THIS IN THE CLASSICS SECTION??? ITS NOT EVEN METAL!!!

This is why this website constantly pisses me off. The reviewing of shitty fairy metal and boring melodeth, plus the almost whole sale neglect of underground classics that defined heavy metal.

But none of these things are important......let us bask in the glory of Kip fucking Winger.

I'm going to Barbarian Wrath, at least they're not gay there.

This has been explained a lot of times... The classic is full of stuff that is not classic, just older reviews... and there's a lot of crap in this section. This, and the lot of Axxis records, are a good examples. But one thing, all the classics reviewed lately are indouptable classics.

(Yeah, and I think there's a lot of classics to be reviewed... Satan, Raven, Witchfinder General, Manilla Road, Warlord, for example... Just give time to the reviewers.

Dude, your opinion is irrelevant. See, you want this website to review everything YOU like. My suggestion to you would be to start your own reviews website. That way everything you want reviewed gets reviewed.

Have you ever even listened to this CD? You act as if this is so far removed from metal, like it's rap! Ridiculous.

As for it being a classic, I didn't realize it wasn't when I wrote this. It's just an Archive review.

Killer CD, too!

Yeah, Holy, I'm sure those barbarians (men in loincloths) are less gay than we are.

Otherwise, I thought you'd have got used to people reacting like this by now, Ken.

Aww Zad, I can't stay mad at you. You little guy you.

Right, I understand it'll happen, but I really don't see the need. I mean, forum members trying to dictate what gets reviewed is just weird.

Shut yer mouth you little bugger.

I would also be very happy if Disillusion by Loudness was reviewed. Or Hurricane Eyes....or any of their first three.

Why? You own them, obviously, and like them. Why would you like to see them reviewed? Is it really necessary? The same goes for classics, sure, there are plenty classics that could be reviewed, but everyones' opinion of what is classic and what isn't is different. How could the reviewers here possibly cover every classic you guys want reviewed and still cover all the new music/bands?? There's aren't many reviewers here.

I like reviewing music that doesn't get reviewed on every other review website out there.

I actually don't have them, I've been trying to get them forever and I am teased here and there with little tidbits from the albums. They sound excellent.

Then disregard what I said.