FrigidSymphony wrote:
The Ghost of Eyesore wrote:
FrigidSymphony wrote:
Yeah. Actually I read the Sword because I read the First King Of Shannara first, and I loved, didn't find it a ripoff at all.
Yeah, First King is good. The problem with Sword is that it was his first book, and he struggled with creating his world while telling a good, original story. It wasn't until about halfway through the book that I started really liking it. It was just slow. But it's his first book. You can't really use that as the benchmark.
I actually first read the Voyage of Jerle Shannar trilogy first. Probably a dumb thing to do, but I found the first book in the discount bin for $5.98 and thought it sounded great. Some stuff I didn't get, but it was still a great series. I totally recommend the rest of his stuff.
Yeah, the first part was kinda slow. My favourite character is Panamon, maybe Menion Leah... As soon as P turned up M became a lot more interesting.
And I thought I should start with the Shannara series because I really liked the three Landover books I read (For Sale, Black Unicorn, Wizard at Large)
Yeah, Landover is great. Just a good, fun read. Brooks has basically connected all his stories now. His latest book, Armageddon's Children, is about the Great Wars, what caused our world to become Shannara. It starts, though, with his Word & Void trilogy. So, if you end up reading all his Shannara books, you'd have to quit reading at Straken, and then read the Word & Void trilogy before reading Armageddon's Children—which I will be reading soon.
So basically, since the Word & Void trilogy is based in our time, as is the Landover series, he's basically connected all his books; though the Landover series has no direct connection, really.
Am I making sense?