Antonakis wrote:
noodles wrote:
seriously it took like 40 minutes for fighting to actually start (the start could at least have been used to flesh out the characters of the captain and his son and that other guy or something) and the evil counsel dude side-plot was totally pointless. also it needed more non-slowed down action scenes.
You probably already know that the movie is based on Frank Miller's graphic novel of the same title and is quite faithful to it. Other than the inherent nature of novels (graphical inlcuded) being generally slower in action than movies, you can't blame an author like Frank Miller for creating it in that way since he didn't have in mind then that it'd become a movie after some years. You could complain about the director or screenplay writers for not having more action scenes but then it wouldn't be so faithful to the original novel, would it ? It's always a risky business addapting novels etc on the big screen since there are always those who want a pure movie and those who want a true addaptation of the original.
i agree with noodles that the whole "political intrigue" thing was completely unnecessary, and i add that the wife's speech was completely fucking cliche and should be edited out in future releases of the movie.
the slowed down action scenes were ok, my problem was that there weren't enough action scenes (slow or otherwise). even after they meet up with the Persians there's still a hell of a lot of talk going on. the beginning was fine, it set the scene and all that.
as for being true to the original work, i think that most people weren't familiar with Miller's work in the first place, and that given the trailer etc. it really needed more action.
all in all it was still a good movie, but disappointing action-wise.