Metal Reviews

Newest and Best Metal Reviews!
FAQ :: Search :: Members :: Groups :: Register
Login
It is currently Fri May 23, 2025 10:46 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: 'Ministry - The Last Sucker (#4339)'
PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 1:40 am 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:50 am
Posts: 5515
You're welcome to comment on:
Quote:
Image
Ministry - The Last Sucker
Industrial Metal
Quoted: 93 / 100


Click here to see the review.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:30 pm 
Offline
Metal Fighter

Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:19 am
Posts: 367
I would probably rate this a bit less (85/100), but its still without a doubt a very good and solid album.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:17 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29891
Location: UK
RedHawk wrote:
I would probably rate this a bit less (85/100), but its still without a doubt a very good and solid album.


I rated it one higher than the review of Rio Grande Blood here, just to make the point that I thought it was a better album. I think it deserves a particularly high score anyways, considering that it's the last album from Ministry and that it's such a kickass piece of work.

I think of ratings in a vague way anyhow - > 80 = great, 70 - 80 = okay and < 70 = poor.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:58 pm 
Zad wrote:
I think of ratings in a vague way anyhow - > 80 = great, 70 - 80 = okay and < 70 = poor.


That's just nonsense!


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:02 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29891
Location: UK
Stefan wrote:
Zad wrote:
I think of ratings in a vague way anyhow - > 80 = great, 70 - 80 = okay and < 70 = poor.


That's just nonsense!


I know! It's just how I shuffle them about in my head. The important thing's the words, anyways, I wouldn't use scores except that would mark me out as a Misha-esque hippy rebel.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:18 pm 
Zad wrote:
Stefan wrote:
Zad wrote:
I think of ratings in a vague way anyhow - > 80 = great, 70 - 80 = okay and < 70 = poor.


That's just nonsense!


I know! It's just how I shuffle them about in my head. The important thing's the words, anyways, I wouldn't use scores except that would mark me out as a Misha-esque hippy rebel.


I can't understand why we have a rating from 0 to 100 if 50 is not the average rate... :unsure:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 01, 2008 1:22 am 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 3:24 am
Posts: 2826
Location: U.S.
Stefan wrote:
Zad wrote:
Stefan wrote:
Zad wrote:
I think of ratings in a vague way anyhow - > 80 = great, 70 - 80 = okay and < 70 = poor.


That's just nonsense!


I know! It's just how I shuffle them about in my head. The important thing's the words, anyways, I wouldn't use scores except that would mark me out as a Misha-esque hippy rebel.


I can't understand why we have a rating from 0 to 100 if 50 is not the average rate... :unsure:


That seems logical, except I think it just leaves too huge of an area for "above average" albums. The school grades is more practical with 70 being average, except I would say that 80's can constitute great albums.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 10:45 pm 
Offline
Svartalfar

Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:25 pm
Posts: 13
I haven´t listened to any Ministry except Hotrod but this record kicks ass a plenty. I´ve got to check out the rest!

The 1-100 is exponential so the grades are higher.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 8:48 am 
Offline
Sailor Man
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 9:00 pm
Posts: 6179
Location: Italiae
Why not stick with "How We Quote ?" ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 1:58 pm 
Offline
Einherjar
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 6:24 pm
Posts: 2527
I dunno about this one. A great deal of it sounded exactly like Rio Grande to me.

Much of it was dull, and while it's all quite a bit better than say, Filth Pig, I didn't really like it that much.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2008 4:13 am 
Offline
Metal Lord

Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 10:34 am
Posts: 636
Good album would prefer to hear a real drummer not a fan of drum machines sorry. I know the review says Joey Jordinson on drums but he isn't mentioned in booklet it only says about the drums being programmed and it sounds it.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group