Metal Reviews

Fair enough.

The irony of this certain post is an oh so certain portly chap, under the name of Schultz has actually stated something along similar lines. Though if recollection serves me best I remember O'Reilly's blunders, being mainly and thus the most recently being the government should expand the CIA, Marshall service, and the FBI. Also so called true "conservative" hosts arguing for the deportation of muslims, database of people with Middle eastern names, and the perpetual demonization of the ever ignus fatuus the American "left".

This being the miserable little chap Savage, who acts with all of his degrees his hate spewning and conspiratorial nonsense is worth listening too, when he should be on some street corner in San Francisco writing dime books about Ayurveda and selling herbal medicine. Now if this not the epitome of the word "hack", then I'm not sure what is.

All I know is, it's not MSNBC predicting that this will spark an Islamic revolution in England, and it's not MSNBC who use maps like this -

http://plixi.com/p/73294801

MSNBC's political televangelists regularly showcase teapartiers as num-skulled racist reactionaries, castigate every nutjob violent offender as some right-wing lunatic, slaps the wrists of the democrats as opposed to full-frontal criticism, and unsurprisingly sullies the Republicans and other televangelists on their fellow liberal station FAUX news. While the network in and of itself may lack the nauseatingly vapid Sarah Palin, the whining and Mccarthyite Beck, and the neocon hack Hannity I see little distinguishing it from FAUX.

So to summarize:
American "news" is full of hacks and whores.

I'm not saying MSNBC are good. I'm saying at least they know what maps are.

+1. No matter how douche-y they are they are not incompetent or at least not so blatantly as Fox. God, I hate Savage. Steve is dead-on with his critiques and they're kinda lolworthy.

To be partisan, he would have to never go against the party line. Partisan politics are party-based, not ideal-based. If Olbermann criticizes democrats because he thinks they're not being liberal enough, he's ignoring party lines to uphold an ideal. Hardly partisan.

What irks me to no end is the context under which these pretenders usurp the term "conservative". When I conjure up the term "conservative" in political discourse with nominal right wingers, they usually abscond to either Ronald Reagan or ever more disturbingly George Bush. I,e the prototypical pro-corporate, deregulatory, pro war, interventionist, oil guzzling autocrat whose penchant for sending young American middle class young men to die for geopolitical goals, is only surpassed by their ability to leap over the constitution. Suffice to say that when I hear some jester say Obama is destroying the country, bringing socialism, is a godless Kenyan muslim, I have no other option than to view the other alternative of the flag-waving, faith based, unquestioning Bush years. Conservatism is now recognized by a Jay-lenno lookalike, an Irish nymphomaniac, a morbidly obese druggie, and a closet panywaist whose only goal in life is to perpetuate the myth of a "liberal conspiracy". Fuck them all.

At least the Tories have some level of class. Cameron's a cunt, but I'd rather have him in charge than anyone from Fox.

Semantics.
Biased, then.
And if Olbermann is non-partisan, then the same must be said of O'Reilly, since he has benn critical of Bush at times.

Out of curiosity, who would you consider a true conservative?

My fellow Arizonan Barry Goldwater

Interesting. He was more Libertarian than anything else, though.
I agree, BTW.
What about Buckley?

the weakest aspect of either individual is the anti-communist nonsense, with Buckley my issue is his defense of Mccarthy, Buckley judging by a few things was also a foreign policy interventionist, other than that he isn't all that different than Goldwater was.

Everybody has something that is disagreeable about their philosophy; Buckley was smart, but he wasn't flawless.
At any rate, the anti-communism was a product of the era.
And, to be perfectly blunt, communism goes against everything that makes humans excel.
One of the most interesting interviews I've seen is the one with Buckley and Norman Mailer.
Two intellectuals on opposite sides (more or less) of the political spectrum.

The way I see it, the biggest dissapointment (other than being hijacked by neo-cons) of the conservative movement is that it has been co-opted by religious fanatics.
That and becoming, by and large, corporate puppets.
Still, their are a few true paleo-conservatives left.

What's the word on this Gary Johnson fellow? Seems to be a more sensible Ron Paul, from what I can glean, certainly a more desirable GOP candidate in 2012 than Palin.

Still rooting for David Duke.

Unfamiliar with him, to be honest.
But this country had better change course fast, or we are in big trouble.