cry of the banshee wrote:
I fail to see any difference between one that denies the existence of god and one that claims that he exists.
Both are fooling themselves, thinking they "know" what the truth really is. And both are generally arrogant, condescending assholes that think they have the answer, when, really they don't, and beyond that cannot prove their case. Both are engaged in giant leaps of faith, only on opposing sides.
Is their anything more futile thatn arguing about the existence of god?
Once you understand the realm of physics is not a three dimensional phenomenon that we human beings experience, one realizes they know almost nothing about the universe, nor can we even begin to realize it's potential.
Take electricity for example. As a three dimensional physics phenomenon, we can only use self-destroying power, where KVL and KCL take precedent. In a fourth dimension scenario we can harness unlimited free voltage, suspend time itself (a 3D illusion) and use the unlimited current that flows by the conservation of energy in the form of unlimited flux. This does not violate KVL because voltage would be unlimited and the flowing current would be zero, yet in a timeless domain, the current is only limited by the amount of flux and not flowing current. In the 3D world, we need moving current to produce electricity. But in a 4D world, the flux provides current and the atoms that flow from a voltage source stay suspended in an absolute zero state.
God, I love when Adveser fucks a debate up with analogies coming from nowhere.