Indeed! The more I look into what people are saying about Occupy, the less I like it. Take this example:
http://beyoungshutup.wordpress.com/2011 ... edinburgh/
Quote:
Occupy Edinburgh is sexist. Thankfully, unlike Occupy Glasgow, I haven’t heard about any rapes or sexual assaults, but it’s still sexist.
People have said that they feel physically intimidated; that they can’t express their views freely; that certain members of camp, specifically the ‘security team’ have a lot of power (which makes them feel uncomfortable); and even that women have been told that they are not allowed to talk about the rape at Occupy Glasgow.
Quote:
Within five minutes of starting our meeting, a man from the ‘security team’ asked us what we were doing, criticised us for coming in and trying to change things without having camped there (the irony being that we don’t feel comfortable or safe enough to camp), and was basically very intimidating. He said if someone had concerns they could raise them at a General Assembly. (Incidentally, we couldn’t raise our concerns at the General Assembly that evening since long debates about de-humidifiers were prioritised over talking about making camp less patriarchal.)
It turns out that this man thinks feminism is an evil created by ‘Jewish bankers’.
Nutters. Occupy Wall Street may be different, but this is not some global network that will bring about positive revolutionary change. The best thing I expect from Occupy is a Chris Morris film that does to lefties what Four Lions did to Islamic terrorists.