DevotedWalnut wrote:
All I did was turn down his idea. He took it the wrong way, now he's gone. And yet we still have a full pool.
First, let me be clear, sometimes you are narrow-minded and also at times prone to exaggeration (my own flaws, of course, are legion). What follows is my attempt to get through to you on that narrow-mindedness aspect, and hopefully not get a Ken type response.
Remember this post from a few weeks ago in the iphone thread?
DevotedWalnut wrote:
emperorblackdoom wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
emperorblackdoom wrote:
DevotedWalnut wrote:
Oh no, scary technology.
Go say your prayers to Saint Steve Jobs, hipster.
Don't forget your sunglasses when you take your bi-monthly trip outside, the sun is bright.
It is ok, Wally, you've found god!
http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-05-21/tech/29982282_1_apple-stores-steve-jobs-brain"The cult of Apple is real, according to neuroscientists. They compared MRIs of Apple fans' brains to those of people who call themselves "very religious" and found that Apple and religion light up the same part of the brain.
This means that Apple triggers the same feelings and reactions in people as religion."
You've been saving this one, cute.
I saw you edit that last quote, originally you said something defensive along the lines of "so what, I like my phone". I saw the change, realized I had go too far by comparing your Iphone thing to religion, and then changed the tact of the thread by making fun of my old age and the thread went on to a happy, trollish ending.
In this hockey thread I made a suggestion, which I prefaced with "I ask for this every year" so I wasn't expecting a change of heart or anything. I was fine with you outright declining as the commissioner, Chaos agreed with you, and you'll note I was ready to drop it.
Quote:
Welcome to the world of sports.
Quote:
Cool story man.
The problem, Wally, is that you can be a blockhead. Had you acknowledged that you were in the position of power here, you could have just shut down my idea, but you didn't. You had to "win".
Some previous examples about narrow-mindedness:
You've claimed, regardless of context: "If you didn't vote for Mental Vortex, you are not a fan of metal music." (From the "My Arms Your Hearse vs Mental Vortex" in Lich Lords) You also recently claimed in the pot thread that "doom metal is completely about pot", then backed up when called on it and said "all the doom I listen to is about pot."
Now back to the argument, you had a point about hockey not being baseball, but you weren't the type of person to understand where I am coming from with the baseball allusion (you mentioned sports generally afterall before, so I brought up sports), and rather than acknowledging that difference as just a matter of perspective, you
still had to win the argument.
I don't take kindly to insults, and generally overreact, so obviously I am at fault here too. It was dumb of me to even mention another scoring system when everyone seemed happy with it last year. But I do try to understand other people's perspectives, and that is why I completely changed course in the Iphone thread, or why I try to listen to things from Vektor to Ancestor to Krallice.
So all I am saying is, the next time someone disagrees with you, just try understanding where they are coming from for a change. That is all.
Have a good league this year.