traptunderice wrote:
cry of the banshee wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
Goat wrote:
cry of the banshee wrote:
Goat wrote:
I didn't mean it negatively. From what you were saying about western society a few pages back it seems a fair assumption to make. I know I'd love it if some of my views were mainstream...
It's part of the price of a somewhat free society.
Yep, that's the bottom line...
Wow. That was cute how you guys packed up that ideological moment nice and neatly like that. You had all the conflict one person could handle and the status quo has been restored in under two hours.
I actually agree with you on all points on this topic. So what do you suggest, then? Abolish the "sex biz"? That will never happen.
Go after the pornographers themselves?
Funnily enough, porn might be getting outsourced soon after this:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2 ... w-law.htmlI don't think you can abolish the sex biz and in some ways what comes out of the sex biz is kinda awesome, i.e., I kinda enjoy going to the Hustler store. And it's not about the films or videos, but the people who watch them. Dare I say that I think a lot of the problem with pornography is how people perceive reality and I think that is intimately tied to the commodity form. Sex becomes a means to an end, an exchange relation, rather than an act that is enjoyed in the process. Sex becomes all about the money shot. I'm not saying people don't enjoy sex while they're doing it, but how people perceive others' bodies is intimately tied to how they perceive commodities. Sue me, I'm a broken record, but
I only think that capitalism can be as unchallengeable it is if it can pervade its process throughout civil society. Sorry.
Regarding the last sentence, well there is some truth in that. I would go a bit further and apply that criteria to any form of "democracy".
In fact, I read somewhere that the founding fathers had stated that this form of government will only work with a moral, civil society.
Sadly, the same applies to any political system, even Marxism, as you well know any theory is only as good as the persons (government) that is holding the reins.
The wild card will always be the human factor.
The role of governance generally attracts exactly the type of person that is least suited to govern justly. It's a Catch-22.