The Annoying Frenchman wroteWhen a reasoning is articulate as some have been, I'm not the one who will call it "closed-mindedness". Those who thrashed the album just because "it doesn't sound like the real Morbid Angel" are denying a band the possibility to actually evolve.Don't deny it, Val. Some would have said it was crap even if the industrial thingy had actually worked.And I'm not saying it hasn't, I haven't listened to it yet but I will.
How are they denying them anything? They are commenting on the output; if it sucks, it sucks.And, yes, when band x is one of the founders of a given sub-genre, a certain level of quality is going to be expected from their fanbase. Especially if they are made to wait eight fucking years.As has been mentioned, if I want to hear industrial, disco, C&W or what have you, that is what I will put into my CD player.
Don't deny it, Val. Some would have said it was crap even if the industrial thingy had actually worked.
Speculation, and not germaine to the topic. How do you know that is what would happen, and even if so, it is correct; even without the "industrial" bits, it's hackneyed crap.
And lastly, if you have not even heard it yet, how can you sit here and criticize those that criticize the album?