Revelation Theory - Truth Is Currency (#3206)

rio · **Posted:** Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:03 pm

I must say that this review has gone totally over my head, because I am too puny minded to comprehend nu-metal. I'm ashamed to say I dismissed this band out of hand because I am so arrogant in my own tastes.

winkrollolz

Radagast · **Posted:** Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:03 pm

Zad wrote:

lizardtail wrote:

why did you capitalise the "Of"? That sort of thing really pisses me off.

Where's the capital at the start of your sentence? That sort of thing really pisses ME off.

Why did you use capital letters to emphasize a word? That really pisses me off.

lizardtail · **Posted:** Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:04 pm

Zad wrote:

lizardtail wrote:

why did you capitalise the "Of"? That sort of thing really pisses me off.

Where's the capital at the start of your sentence? That sort of thing really pisses ME off.

wHY DID YOU CAPITALISE THE "me"? THTA SORT OF FING RLY PISSES ME OF

sorry Eyesore

rio · **Posted:** Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:04 pm

Radagast wrote:

Zad wrote:

lizardtail wrote:

why did you capitalise the "Of"? That sort of thing really pisses me off.

Where's the capital at the start of your sentence? That sort of thing really pisses ME off.

Why did you use capital letters to emphasize a word? That really pisses me off.

My parents were murdered by an itallicised pronoun. I'll thank you to be more sensitive in future.

Radagast · **Posted:** Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:06 pm

rio wrote:

Radagast wrote:

Zad wrote:

lizardtail wrote:

why did you capitalise the "Of"? That sort of thing really pisses me off.

Where's the capital at the start of your sentence? That sort of thing really pisses ME off.

Why did you use capital letters to emphasize a word? That really pisses me off.

My parents were murdered by an itallicised pronoun. I'll thank you to be more sensitive in future.

O RLY?

By the way, lolz at your first post.

Kathaarian · **Posted:** Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:07 pm

What a buncha thread poopers you are. Then again, this is nu metal, poop on.

rio · **Posted:** Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:08 pm

Radagast wrote:

rio wrote:

Radagast wrote:

Zad wrote:

lizardtail wrote:

why did you capitalise the "Of"? That sort of thing really pisses me off.

Where's the capital at the start of your sentence? That sort of thing really pisses ME off.

Why did you use capital letters to emphasize a word? That really pisses me off.

My parents were murdered by an itallicised pronoun. I'll thank you to be more sensitive in future.

O RLY?

By the way, lolz at your first post.

Do you know that the "e" you left out of "really" could be on the streets right now being sold to underage kids?

hehe

Eyesore · **Posted:** Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:10 pm

Zad wrote:

Eyesore wrote:

Zad wrote:

Eyesore wrote:

So you tried the samples with an open mind, thinking, "I may just like this!"? :roll:

Yes, actually. I do like Evanescense, and some nu-metal is bearable. This did nothing for me, and I'm putting more effort into it than most people would, as you said. Why bother at all? Surely record companies aren't still hawking nu-metal in this day and age? Or are we facing The Revival, as I predicted would happen once people got bored with metalcore?

Should I fix the bad link to "After The Rain" now?

Might help. I would have mentioned it...

Sure. Had you listened to it you would have mentioned it considering you said you listened to the "clips." Plural. More than one. Yadda-yadda.

Radagast · **Posted:** Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:12 pm

Eyesore wrote:

Zad wrote:

Eyesore wrote:

Zad wrote:

Eyesore wrote:

So you tried the samples with an open mind, thinking, "I may just like this!"? :roll:

Yes, actually. I do like Evanescense, and some nu-metal is bearable. This did nothing for me, and I'm putting more effort into it than most people would, as you said. Why bother at all? Surely record companies aren't still hawking nu-metal in this day and age? Or are we facing The Revival, as I predicted would happen once people got bored with metalcore?

Should I fix the bad link to "After The Rain" now?

Might help. I would have mentioned it...

Sure. Had you listened to it you would have mentioned it considering you said you listened to the "clips." Plural. More than one. Yadda-yadda.

[hilarious pwned picture]

Goat · **Posted:** Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:14 pm

Eyesore wrote:

Zad wrote:

Eyesore wrote:

Zad wrote:

Eyesore wrote:

So you tried the samples with an open mind, thinking, "I may just like this!"? :roll:

Yes, actually. I do like Evanescense, and some nu-metal is bearable. This did nothing for me, and I'm putting more effort into it than most people would, as you said. Why bother at all? Surely record companies aren't still hawking nu-metal in this day and age? Or are we facing The Revival, as I predicted would happen once people got bored with metalcore?

Should I fix the bad link to "After The Rain" now?

Might help. I would have mentioned it...

Sure. Had you listened to it you would have mentioned it considering you said you listened to the "clips." Plural. More than one. Yadda-yadda.

I said I tried the clips, I never said I listened to them. Nice try.

Eyesore · **Posted:** Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:18 pm

Zad wrote:

Eyesore wrote:

Zad wrote:

Eyesore wrote:

Zad wrote:

Eyesore wrote:

So you tried the samples with an open mind, thinking, "I may just like this!"? :roll:

Yes, actually. I do like Evanescense, and some nu-metal is bearable. This did nothing for me, and I'm putting more effort into it than most people would, as you said. Why bother at all? Surely record companies aren't still hawking nu-metal in this day and age? Or are we facing The Revival, as I predicted would happen once people got bored with metalcore?

Should I fix the bad link to "After The Rain" now?

Might help. I would have mentioned it...

Sure. Had you listened to it you would have mentioned it considering you said you listened to the "clips." Plural. More than one. Yadda-yadda.

I said I tried the clips, I never said I listened to them. Nice try.

Do you own the OJ Simpson trial on DVD?

Goat · **Posted:** Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:20 pm

Eyesore wrote:

Zad wrote:

Eyesore wrote:

Zad wrote:

Eyesore wrote:

Zad wrote:

Eyesore wrote:

So you tried the samples with an open mind, thinking, "I may just like this!"? :roll:

Yes, actually. I do like Evanescense, and some nu-metal is bearable. This did nothing for me, and I'm putting more effort into it than most people would, as you said. Why bother at all? Surely record companies aren't still hawking nu-metal in this day and age? Or are we facing The Revival, as I predicted would happen once people got bored with metalcore?

Should I fix the bad link to "After The Rain" now?

Might help. I would have mentioned it...

Sure. Had you listened to it you would have mentioned it considering you said you listened to the "clips." Plural. More than one. Yadda-yadda.

I said I tried the clips, I never said I listened to them. Nice try.

Do you own the OJ trial on DVD?

:roll:

Eyesore · **Posted:** Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:21 pm

Sorry, but you also said:

Quote:

No, I tried the samples, and didn't like them, so you can't say that.

and then...

Quote:

This did nothing for me, and I'm putting more effort into it than most people would, as you said.

Yeah, I guess lying about listening is more effort than just ignoring it. What's the point?

rio · **Posted:** Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:23 pm

*queue televised car chase*

Radagast · **Posted:** Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:26 pm

rio wrote:

*queue televised car chase*

Zad's going down if he doesn't close that boot.

Goat · **Posted:** Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:28 pm

Eyesore wrote:

Sorry, but you also said:

Quote:

No, I tried the samples, and didn't like them, so you can't say that.

and then...

Quote:

This did nothing for me, and I'm putting more effort into it than most people would, as you said.

Yeah, I guess lying about listening is more effort than just ignoring it. What's the point?

Look at what you just wrote. "Tried". And I said "this". So you're agreeing with me. :roll:

Ultimately, Ken, I couldn't give a fuck whether you believe that I clicked on the link or not. All I know is that I've wasted enough of my time on this band, which has bought our once-friendly relationship ever closer to implosion. I won't bother even checking future nu-metal reviews of yours out, since I can see the end result.

Goat · **Posted:** Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:29 pm

rio wrote:

*queue televised car chase*

"Cue", not "queue".

rio · **Posted:** Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:32 pm

Zad wrote:

rio wrote:

*queue televised car chase*

"Cue", not "queue".

Aieeee.... my powers of grammatical accuracy are fading.... I'm melting!

Eyesore · **Posted:** Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:38 pm

Zad wrote:

Eyesore wrote:

Sorry, but you also said:

Quote:

No, I tried the samples, and didn't like them, so you can't say that.

and then...

Quote:

This did nothing for me, and I'm putting more effort into it than most people would, as you said.

Yeah, I guess lying about listening is more effort than just ignoring it. What's the point?

Look at what you just wrote. "Tried". And I said "this". So you're agreeing with me. :roll:

Ultimately, Ken, I couldn't give a fuck whether you believe that I clicked on the link or not. All I know is that I've wasted enough of my time on this band, which has bought our once-friendly relationship ever closer to implosion. I won't bother even checking future nu-metal reviews of yours out, since I can see the end result.

Zad, it's not about you liking something or not, this is about you talking negatively about a band that you didn't listen to. Your own words are contradicting each other here. These bands are out there trying to make something happen for themselves, we review them and try and give them a very subjective review for those people that would be interested in something like this. People listen, too.

But when someone comes along and implies that they're not very good, people also listen. Unfortunately only one person between you and I listened to the music before they gave an opinion. Do you think that's fair?

Goat · **Posted:** Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:46 pm

Eyesore wrote:

Zad, it's not about you liking something or not, this is about you talking negatively about a band that you didn't listen to. Your own words are contradicting each other here. These bands are out there trying to make something happen for themselves, we review them and try and give them a very subjective review for those people that would be interested in something like this. People listen, too.

But when someone comes along and implies that they're not very good, people also listen. Unfortunately only one person between you and I listened to the music before they gave an opinion. Do you think that's fair?

I did listen to the sample that worked. And didn't like it. And said so. If the bands were really out for the best market, they'd realise that nu-metal's time has gone.

Either way, this thread has more responses than any other of the new ones, so I guess you suceeded, huh?

Metal Reviews

Revelation Theory - Truth Is Currency (#3206)

Who is online