Metal Reviews

Back on topic:

I already saw that. Still, I wish I could smash that bitch's psychotic smile with a wrecking ball. As someone pointed out, this is the clear product of massive inbreeding - after all they explain in the video that their "church" is comprised of about 100 people, most of whom belong to the same family. Hence, a bunch of spiritually illuminated mongrels. They should be put out of their misery, and chances are someone will do it. And after having a look at their site, I feel significantly stupider.

i wonder what excuse they would use if some of their own got killed - wrath of God? hmm.. perhaps they would blame Satan... or perhaps they would wake up to the real world

i think they should read the bible through a number of times, untill they realise how wrong and ignorant they are. Even God change in the bible, from being a vengeful prick who only cared about one group of people to the christian God, that most ppl should now about today ( with small variation within each group of course).




the documentry i referred to is not some sort of a Michael Moore documentry... this is military ppl and politicians with inside knowlegde who openly talks about the Iraq War through interviews.... It's not done in Moore style

If your father told you that your mother didn't like apple pie, you wouldn't tell him to go find other sources, would you?

There as just as many military people and politicians with "inside knowledge" who will defend Bush, though. Besides you are being hypocritical for not trusting politicians who defend the war yet relying on them as sources for your own stance. Military officials are also politicians that do less talking and more killing. Finally keep in mind, it is very easy to quote out of context and skew "facts" to fit your own conclusions. You need to understand that BOTH sides are just as willing to do it.






Political discussions are fun.

i get your point...

but hey... what is the point of revealing facts when you are retired from service? Politicians often have dirty secrets, somebody have to reveal them after all...


But i do know the power of the media... i once believe that the moonlanding was a hoax untill i say program that disproved all the bullshit... which actually made me happy, cuz i had been wandering around pissed off for a year, and though it was a disgusting thing to do, i mean, it is written in history books after all so every ppl who'd live in 200 years would still believe USA were the first on the moon even though it would be a lie...

But still... there are many lies in this world that are concealed by the media, that ppl never will be told or hear. What we know is always from television or newpaper etc, which is bad.. especielly when a tv-network is control by other ppl than the presisdent of the network... Fox channel is f.ex controlled by the government, when filmdirectors makes movies about war and want to borrow machinery from pentagon, pentagon first want to make sure that no dirty secrets are revieled in the movie - censorship is a bad thing, but it still accurs in our modern world, not only in america... Silvio Berlusconi f.ex. has been critized for extensive control of the media.

Merely because we can't change something doesn't mean we shouldn't talk about it. If that were the case, we wouldn't be allowed to talk about how crappy St. Anger is.

Zad, you're being a stupid, ignorant cocksucker! You clearly have no fucking clue what you're talking about, I'd suggest you refrain from making asinine comments again.

And yes, for the record, before anyone tries to point it out, his stupid comments on this subject piss me off and I'm responding like an asshole because it's justified.

EDIT: Let me put this into perspective, now that I've had my momentary outburst, I served 8 years in the Air Force and I have a ton of friends still serving. One of my best friends is right now in Afghanistan for the THIRD time in recent years. Pardom me if I get upset at the ignorance portrayed in this thread by some people. It's one thing to discuss and argue politics, it's another to suggest that those who have no control over such issues should "...all get blown up...". I say FUCK YOU to any asshole that bows to such blatant idiocy.

Ahem, does anyone have the will to discuss the upcoming Iran war? That's going to be fucking huge and probably these whole arguments will be nothing against the brutality of it. And that Iranian motherfucker says he might hit Turkey too. Sonova bitch, I'll love to see him fucking dead. I don't wanna comment on Iraq but the Iran war will be just, he's begging for it.

Doesn't mean everyone should spout off about it ad nausem though eithier. It is what it is, and this whole "It's not fair" shit is retarded. Saddam was a fuck who treated his own people like shit and got what he deserved. Yeah, we did go into Iraq for the wrong reasons, but that doesn't mean I'm going to sympathize with a tyrant eithier.

And yes Iraq DID have WMD's, Reagan sold them to Saddam, and Saddam sold them off before we came knocking.

So... should we have gone to North Korea instead? And after that, why don't we make a stop or two in Africa? Are we the international police?

If we are, then what the fuck are we doing NOT going into Darfur?



In this case, the definition of WMD's is varied. He had gas missiles and whatnot, but no A-bombs, H-bombs, or anything conventionally defined as WMDs.

And even if he has them, how can America blame a nation for having nuclear weapons, when they have the most themselves? Keep in mind that America is still the only country that has used them, in WWII as well as in the Gulf war!

"Gulf war?"
"Yes, that is correct"

America's nuclear bombs are not a thread to America... that's the difference

that woman is fucking insane. It makes me sick to hear this sort of crap. It only makes my resolution to remain atheist more steady. but if this was on fox news... wasn't fox extreme christian right-wing bush ass kissing tv?

I wouldn't be worried about the states having A-bombs, i'd be more worried about Iran having WMD's because Iran is run by religious fanatics.... and for a few laughs, check this guy out...http://www.suttonimpactstudio.com/

A royal thread hijack if I ever saw one.

well.. Bush also said that God told him to invade Iraq.. so..

i wouldn't be surprised if America used nuclear bombs again within the next 150 years. I wouldn't mind if other countries had a-bombs, else america would always have the upper hand/ an ace up their sleeve... not all countries should be allowed to have a-bombs though.. Iran is one of them.

You're assuming that I agree with the war. I don't. Iraq has lots of gold and oil, that's why we are there. The idiot threatened to embargo and sanction us on oil. He played a game of chess and lost, such is life. No, we shouldn't be there, but we are. And what you fail to realize is the Iraqi people WILL be better off without him in power once we finally sort everything out. The women of Iraq have rights now, is that so wrong?

Yes we are the International Police, we have been ever since the rest of the world tore us a new asshole for not getting involved in World War 2. Nothing new is going on, it's been this way for 60 years now. I said in the other thread, damned if we do, damned if we don't. If we do something, people say America is just being a bully. If we don't do something, the same people then say how America should do something because they have the power. It's a catch-22.

I don't think the US should be the only country with the bomb, but countries like North Korea and Iran are prime examples of two countries that SHOULD NOT have an atomic bomb. Kim-Jong-El is a crazy son of a bitch, who would use it on anybody he pleased at the drop of a hat. There is a real threat in this world, bad people do have power in certain places.

We don't believe in Jihading the Infidels. That's the difference here.

And before you link some BS about the first Gulf War, my brother served in the First Gulf War as a communications expert, so tread lightly.

You are wrong. Women of Iraq has less rights now than with Saddam. The reason is that taking off the SOD has buried Irak in a civil war lead by two opposite fanatic muslim factions. Al-Quaeda vs Chiite pro-iranian. And for the two factions, women are inferior.

The only ones that have freedom thanks to the invasion are the kurds. Yeah, the kurd women (of irak) have now more rights... As the kurd men.

You people blow my mind sometimes. They can vote, they can participate in the Olympics, all things they couldn't do before. They can drive, I could go on and on.

And the Kurds aren't being gassed to death and thrown into mass graves, Saddam and his sons aren't keeping women as sex slaves anymore. All good things. Anyone who would defend Saddam Hussein and his actions is a fucking moron who doesn't pay attention.

Pre-Saddam, Iraq was one of the most prosperous and wealthy countries on the planet, he took all of the money and kept it all for himself. The people struggled, and he and his family partied hard. Tell me how THAT is justified. This guy killed his own Brother-In-Law for crying out loud.

I've just watched this for the first time.

SHE'S FUCKIN' BATSHIT! :shock:

By the way, I love how American news networks just attack these people. Lovely propaganda. I wish they had just shot holes in her theory instead of calling her a disgrace (which she is, she's a fucking pervert).