Zad wrote:
Eyesore wrote:
You're dense, dude.
Oh, not an insult, eh?
If you take it as such, sure. What do you expect when someone continuously says things in very simple terms and you respond in a way that doesn't even make logical sense in context of what you should be replying to?
Zad wrote:
Eyesore wrote:
You talk about art, like it matters to you, yet you download most of your music and you seemingly "discover" 20 new bands a day!
Lies. I don't download more than a track or two of bands. I buy music, and am proud of it. And the bands I discover I pass on, what is wrong with that? Each and every one of the bands I have made threads about I keep an eye on, watching to see if I find their CDs. You have no idea what the fuck you are talking about, like usual.
No, I do. See, the point is that you speak too quick! Keeping an eye on a band and
knowing a band are two different things! Why even bring them up if you can't even discuss them. This is essentially what goes down:
Zad: Hey, check out [insert random band here].
Random Poster: What are they like?
Zad: Not really sure, they sound cool, though.
What's the point? Oh, right, the
point is +1 post count.
Zad wrote:
Eyesore wrote:
It's not art for you because you don't give a shit, that's why you can't talk about these bands you supposedly like. Bands and music are fleeting moments for the likes of you. Then you come onto a messageboard and spew your nonsense like you know what you're talking about!
Again, lies. I talk lots about music, and I do give a shit. Music helped save me from suicide, you think that I don't give a shit about it? You, really, haven't got a fucking clue. Sure, in comparison with you I might not be as knowledgable as to the works of obscure bands, but for someone who was listening to Britney two years ago, it ain't bad, is it? Insults aren't a good replacement for arguments, Kenobi.
Take my words in context. Anyone coming to this board today would look around and think you know more about music than everyone because you're EVERYWHERE!! Sure, you care about some bands, but like I said, most are fleeting moments in your life. If you were listening to Britney Spears two years ago—thanks for the ammo—then you're trying to hard now.
Zad wrote:
Eyesore wrote:
I like Evanescence, I've admitted it, but all this bullshit you just described, explaining why Trivium sucks, if accurate—which it isn't, surprise, surprise—could directly be attributed to Evanescence!
Evanescence are ripping Metallica off? News to me.
Are you retarded?
Quote:
And my thread o'er there was as much a joke as anything - I know enough about the people who come to this board to know that most won't give a shit. You do, why are you staying out of it? Pride? Whatever, "Fallen" was one of my first albums, and it undoubtably helped me along the way to Metal. And so what if it is applicable to them? Big shitting deal, what does that prove? Nothing.
And when I say you're dense I'm supposed to feel bad?
Quote:
Bull. Shit. It is about the music, and if your tastes had any sort of quality filter on them you'd realise that, Ken. Music has it's mountains and valleys just like books and films. Just like the art it is. Shitty little bands like Evanescence that come along out of nowhere and start selling bazillions are not art. There is nothing sublime about them, like there is about better metal. I hear this song, I think, wow, they've completely revealed their whorish nature. Money. Not art. Isn't that a good enough reason to dislike them? If a band has been around for a while and worked, and actually made art, as Blind Guardian have, then they deserve the financial rewards that I hope are coming to them. Evanescence don't deserve anything except a quick trip to the bargain bin. Fuck 'em.
Clear enough for you? How easy it is to change one word, right? If your logic applies to Trivium, surely it applies to Evanescence.
Zad wrote:
Eyesore wrote:
But, of course, you can't see past your own contradicting words so you'll carry on like they don't matter and start arguing some other angle until you're out of angles and then you'll "be the bigger man" and walk away, possibly make a big scene on the board saying you're leaving just to see how many people give a fuck, then you'll eventually come back to the dismay of those who really know about music.
Oh, what a bitter, bitter man you are, dear Kenneth. Is this how you feel about little old me? As I said in the other thread, which you're studiously avoiding so as not to make your anti-semetism public, I'd have had more respect for you if you'd have made your feelings towards me obvious, rather than pretend friendship. No walking away this time for Zad, just what you want, eh?
Bitter? Hahaha. Not at all. This is humorous.
You keep mentioning this anti-semetism shit, explain yourself considering I'm not avoiding anything on purpose, I have no fucking clue what you're talking about. If you're talking about my silly little Jew comment in the Mel Gibson thread and you're now calling me an anti-semite across the board you can kiss my fucking ass! Jew or no Jew. That was a fucking joke.
Quote:
And you're in an army of one in that last little snip, there. Your arrogance is astounding.
Actually, I'm not, Zad. You're disliked by many.
Zad wrote:
Eyesore wrote:
Quit shitting on our lawn.
Your lawn, you mean? But my dear, I take pleasure in it!
Of course you do, because the internet is an extension of high school, yet opposite where you actually think people like you. At the end of the day, you take pleasure in it because you don't care about music.
.jpg)
