Metal Reviews

Newest and Best Metal Reviews!
FAQ :: Search :: Members :: Groups :: Register
Login
It is currently Sun Jul 06, 2025 1:33 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next   
Author Message
 Post subject: 9/11 conspiracy theories:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:07 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:19 am
Posts: 8644
Location: Aberdeen
bollocks or not?

_________________
I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:09 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 1:02 am
Posts: 319
Location: Leeds , UK
The world is never that interesting. Bollocks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:13 pm 
i don't think it's entirely bollock. But some of it is, without daubt.

but you can see this, and i believe some of the stuff he sais (untill the opposit is proven), best video i've seen so far:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaYepwRb ... on%20crash

He's discussing the laws of nature which were violated the 9-11.

- f.ex. the fall took 10 sec which is the same as free fall (without any resistance).. and no buildings fall with the speed of free fall, especielly not the way the WTC's collapsed

- The metal beams could withstand a whole lot more heat (4-6 times more, 3000 fahrenheit) and for a longer period of time, 6 hours at 2000 fahrenheit, . But the WTC collapse only 45 mins after, even into their own footsteps. Highest temperature: 1300 fahrenheit, average (500-600)

- First time in history a buildings made of steel collapse that way due to fire on an upper floor.

Most likely to have been rigged.


Last edited by Astaroth on Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:27 pm 
Offline
Metal King
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 1421
Location: Brighton
any of you guys seen loose change???


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:43 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 2007
Location: My sickbed.
The WTC towers fell the way they did because they were designed to do so. Can you imagine what would have happened if they had fallen sideways???


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:58 pm 
Carnifex Umbris wrote:
The WTC towers fell the way they did because they were designed to do so. Can you imagine what would have happened if they had fallen sideways???


yup, i could :wink: .. but the towers were designed not to fall in the first place, they were designed to withstand heavy damage from big motherfuck planes :D



btw, i talked to a guy who told me he had seen an amateur videoclip of the Boeing chrashing into the Pentagon.. i've looked all over the net for it, but hasn't found it.. does any of you guys/girls know anything about that? cuz the official released videoclip is beyond worthless.
.. of course, he could have been talking about the WTC towers, he's not the brightest person i know


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:27 pm 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:10 am
Posts: 1763
Location: USA and Asia
Astaroth wrote:
i don't think it's entirely bollock. But some of it is, without daubt.

but you can see this, and i believe some of the stuff he sais (untill the opposit is proven), best video i've seen so far:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaYepwRb ... on%20crash

He's discussing the laws of nature which were violated the 9-11.

- f.ex. the fall took 10 sec which is the same as free fall (without any resistance).. and no buildings fall with the speed of free fall, especielly not the way the WTC's collapsed

- The metal beams could withstand a whole lot more heat (4-6 times more, 3000 fahrenheit) and for a longer period of time, 6 hours at 2000 fahrenheit, . But the WTC collapse only 45 mins after, even into their own footsteps. Highest temperature: 1300 fahrenheit, average (500-600)

- First time in history a buildings made of steel collapse that way due to fire on an upper floor.

Most likely to have been rigged.


Go read the Popular Mechanics article the debunks all of the points you just made in a scientific way. Is an interesting read.

I say bullshit......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:30 pm 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 4:07 am
Posts: 2580
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
100% bollocks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:36 pm 
Offline
Metal King
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 1421
Location: Brighton
Astaroth wrote:
i don't think it's entirely bollock. But some of it is, without daubt.

but you can see this, and i believe some of the stuff he sais (untill the opposit is proven), best video i've seen so far:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaYepwRb ... on%20crash

He's discussing the laws of nature which were violated the 9-11.

- f.ex. the fall took 10 sec which is the same as free fall (without any resistance).. and no buildings fall with the speed of free fall, especielly not the way the WTC's collapsed

- The metal beams could withstand a whole lot more heat (4-6 times more, 3000 fahrenheit) and for a longer period of time, 6 hours at 2000 fahrenheit, . But the WTC collapse only 45 mins after, even into their own footsteps. Highest temperature: 1300 fahrenheit, average (500-600)

- First time in history a buildings made of steel collapse that way due to fire on an upper floor.

Most likely to have been rigged.

That was an intresting vid. I already knew about most of it because i have seen loose change but he put an interesting new angle on it. One thing that i didn't know was the when Bush and Chaney testified to the 9/11 comission they refused to do so under oath, I find that quite incredible.

Astaroth wrote:
btw, i talked to a guy who told me he had seen an amateur videoclip of the Boeing chrashing into the Pentagon.. i've looked all over the net for it, but hasn't found it.. does any of you guys/girls know anything about that? cuz the official released videoclip is beyond worthless.
.. of course, he could have been talking about the WTC towers, he's not the brightest person i know

Such a video does not exist, the only known tapes are from the gas station over the road from which the stills are taken and from a hotel also over the road and a road traffic camera. All of these tapes were taken by the FBI within minutes of the 'plane' crash.

Carnifex Umbris wrote:
The WTC towers fell the way they did because they were designed to do so. Can you imagine what would have happened if they had fallen sideways???

as astaroth said, they were designed to withstand a plane crash, the link he post before has more information on that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:43 pm 
Offline
Metal King
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 1421
Location: Brighton
leee wrote:
Go read the Popular Mechanics article the debunks all of the points you just made in a scientific way. Is an interesting read.

I say bullshit......

a link for that would be great thanks!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:01 pm 
stuartn15ted wrote:
leee wrote:
Go read the Popular Mechanics article the debunks all of the points you just made in a scientific way. Is an interesting read.

I say bullshit......

a link for that would be great thanks!


http://www.popularmechanics.com/science ... page=1&c=y here you go!


i have to admit that some of the claims were rather stupid, and i've never believed those, heh.
I'm happy that some of the claims very debunk, but i still think they needed to debunk a whole lot more of the "myths", before i'm fully satisfied... and some of the planeparts that was found at Pentagon didn't match the Boeing, they should have dealt with that as well as the speed of the falling towers.

also the smaller myths, like these f.ex.: How can 19 terrorist with box cutters hijack several planes, and why are several of them still alive? ( i'm not saying i fully believe them, but they should have taken their time to debunk those as well)


anywho, you can say that the terrorist attack is a conspiracy theory as well to some extend


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:32 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 1:24 am
Posts: 8992
Location: Husker Nation
Orion wrote:
100% bollocks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 1:07 am 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 7:40 am
Posts: 13758
Location: Canada
Loose Change was interesting until the narrarator turned into a raving lunatic.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 1:17 am 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 4:07 am
Posts: 2580
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
noodles wrote:
Loose Change was interesting until the narrarator turned into a raving lunatic.



Yeah, the first 5 seconds or so were great.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 2:19 am 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 3:24 am
Posts: 2826
Location: U.S.
I used to have this great video that talked a lot about the Pentagon strike, but I've lost it...it pointed out some great stuff, like how clean the holes made through the Pentagon were and the fact that there was no airplane debris in the area...if I find it I'll post it here.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:10 am 
Offline
Jeg lever med min foreldre

Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 6:26 pm
Posts: 5736
Location: São Paulo and Lisboa
there's an article on it at Maddox's site, with links to websites that debunk the theories (including the popular mechanics article).

(http://maddox.xmission.com)

but really, wouldn't all this be taken into consideration during planning if this was actually an "inside job"?

_________________
noodles wrote:
live to crush


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:20 am 
Azrael wrote:
there's an article on it at Maddox's site, with links to websites that debunk the theories (including the popular mechanics article).

(http://maddox.xmission.com)

but really, wouldn't all this be taken into consideration during planning if this was actually an "inside job"?


but the government is like stupid lolz. :dio:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 6:26 am 
Offline
Einherjar
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:13 pm
Posts: 1678
Location: Brisbane; Uhshtraaylyah
I just recently watched a dvd called "9/11 Confronting the Evidence". Although some of the theories are pretty silly, overall one can't ignore how dodgy the government's role in it is.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:09 pm 
Offline
Karma Whore
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 7:42 pm
Posts: 3581
Location: Cardiff, Wales
Most of it's bollocks, but there's still something deeply weird about it. Maybe the Western World wanted a new enemy to replace Communism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:59 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 10:44 pm
Posts: 6817
Location: Florida
Bollocks... whatever the hell that means. I'm assuming it means that it's all a bunch of bullshit, which it is.

I like Maddox's article on it.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next   


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group