9/11 conspiracy theories:

Rhys · **Posted:** Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:41 am

Misha wrote:

following the reaper wrote:

FrigidSymphony wrote:

it defenitely seems shady to me. Why didn't bush and cheney testify under oath? Why do survivors claim they heard explosions overhead before the crash? Why haven't i seen a single plane part or body in a shot? but what about the plane that was supposed to crash into the white house but the passengers overran the terrosrists causing it to crash in a field? I honestly would not put a scheme like this past the bush administration, especially considering how it wokred into the iraq invasion. And why the fuck was the president flying to nebraska while the planes struck? damn, bush is evil!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

and form ninja agrees with me. :ph34r:

:"bush is eeevilll!!!"

Are you only referring to the pentagon with the "i seens no plane wreckages!!11" bit?

Cos u know, we saw video of the planes going into the towers. :wink:

It is still quite weird that although the towers were clearly damaged on one side, they didn't tip over like any tower that is being struck by a plane has proved to do. No, it fell straight down, like buildings taken down with explosives.

Well, im not saying the planes were the ONLY thing to hit the towers. The explosion from the planes could have detonated explosives inside the building in a chain reaction kinda thing.

Cú Chulainn · **Posted:** Tue Aug 22, 2006 5:26 pm

and roosevelt might also have ignored the warnings of pearl harbor, but is it coincidence that almost the entire fleet was not in the harbor during the attack? and that roosevelt dearly wanted to enter WWII because he believed it was morally right to stop the "axis of evil"? (or is that a bush term? i can't remember who used that...)

Orion · **Posted:** Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:22 pm

FrigidSymphony wrote:

and roosevelt might also have ignored the warnings of pearl harbor, but is it coincidence that almost the entire fleet was not in the harbor during the attack? and that roosevelt dearly wanted to enter WWII because he believed it was morally right to stop the "axis of evil"? (or is that a bush term? i can't remember who used that...)

You really are one of those conspiracy theory wackos aren't you?

leee · **Posted:** Tue Aug 22, 2006 8:46 pm

Orion wrote:

FrigidSymphony wrote:

and roosevelt might also have ignored the warnings of pearl harbor, but is it coincidence that almost the entire fleet was not in the harbor during the attack? and that roosevelt dearly wanted to enter WWII because he believed it was morally right to stop the "axis of evil"? (or is that a bush term? i can't remember who used that...)

You really are one of those conspiracy theory wackos aren't you?

Actually he is pretty right about that one. We did ignore codes we broke from the Japanese Fleet and things like that, plus the country was still coming out of a depression and wars always end depressions because of the upswing of manufacturing, etc. You should read on it sometime.

leee · **Posted:** Tue Aug 22, 2006 8:47 pm

ganeshaRules wrote:

[quote="leee"You don't see a bunch of assholes turning the bombings in Spain and London into crack pot half baked theories.

Well, just for your information, there's a lot of conspiracy theories about Madrid's bombs in the train, trying to find a link between basque terrorists (ETA) and al-quaeda, and almost saying it was ETA and not al-quaeda. Yes, assholes, but there's a great amount of war of words between the two main spanish political parties around that.[/quote]

Yeah I didn't know that, maybe only Spainard care about Spain while the entire world is worried about the US......

Metal Reviews

9/11 conspiracy theories:

Who is online