yeah.. i read that play yesterday along with another play he wrote.. a horrible writter... however, i don't think you can deduct anything from that shitty play, other than him being a horrible writting... lot's of famous writters/movie directors has written far more outrageous stuff.
The other play was about some boys at a casino talking shit about a defenseless old guy. Then one of the boys wins some money at a slotmachine and the old guy get's his revenge by calling a security guard claiming that the boy pushed him away from the machine just as he was about to win. So the boys get thrown out of the casino and the old guy gets some money. No killings or anything...
however, those are the two only plays released.. he might have writte some sic stuff, i dunno... but these two plays proofs nothing, imo. Only that some ppl like to interpret stuff written by a physco a little too much. The first play is about a boy who hates his stepfather and therefore tries to make him look bad in front of his mother by making false accusations, and in the end his stepfather get mad and kill him. Well, i have read far worse stuff during my time at gymnasium as a part of curriculum, which was considered to be art.
if he had written american psycho i would have been more concerned, though.
however, despite that i don't think they proof he was a psycho, they could still be under influence by his mental illness.
Quote:
Eat this, you giant tree trunk piece of ass!!!! *son tries to choke his stepfather with banana cereal bar*
that would be an instant classic if it was a movie.