Metal Reviews

Newest and Best Metal Reviews!
FAQ :: Search :: Members :: Groups :: Register
Login
It is currently Sun Jul 06, 2025 3:00 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 201 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 11  Next   
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:27 am 
Offline
Jeg lever med min foreldre
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 5096
Location: Upon the high horse of self-destruction
Ive never thought of Arcturus as wanky :P

I find Darkspace to be wanky. Sounds like they are trying to break the mould of black metal, but its just so boring...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 10:17 am 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29896
Location: UK
noodles wrote:
Legacy Of The Night wrote:
Hell, Pig Destroyer is artsy. Converge is artsy.

The thing about those two bands is that for every artsy they do they contrast it with something straightforward, which makes the artsy part and the straightforward part more interesting.

I think finding a balance between being artsy and fun is key. :P


They're also not Metal. I was referring to metal.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 3:50 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:41 am
Posts: 3731
Location: Veldhoven - The Netherlands
Legacy Of The Night wrote:
Mintrude wrote:
Quote:
I really can't understand how you would want metal not to be intellectual...I just like listening to good music, and intellectual music is generally better than music that isn't.


To quote Spinal Tap, "There's a fine line between stupid and clever"
As I've said before, metal that tries to be intellectual drfits off into the realms of wank. I'm sure there are some very good intellectual bands, but it's usually pretentious like Arcturus. Having said that, I don't think a little pretention hurts, if you have the music to back it up. I like Arcturus.


Intelligence =/= wank.

Very much agreed. Wank is the equivalent of a technically extremely realistic painting. That does not make it good, nor art. It's usually less intelligent people with lots of practise that create such paintings/music.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:34 pm 
following the reaper wrote:
Ive never thought of Arcturus as wanky :P

I find Darkspace to be wanky. Sounds like they are trying to break the mould of black metal, but its just so boring...


hmm... i don't find Darkspace to be wanky at all, neither boring.. (but Arcturus on the other hand).... Their first full-lenght album is awsome, and that is that - atmospheric, hypnotic and plain awsomeness. Besides, it's not like they are doing something completely different or new. Imo they just took some elements from Lunar Aurora and made them darker and more spacy.

Misha wrote:
Very much agreed. Wank is the equivalent of a technically extremely realistic painting. That does not make it good, nor art. It's usually less intelligent people with lots of practise that create such paintings/music.


isn't it wankery too, to call such ppl less intelligent just becuase they have painting skills? Imo, it's just as much wankery to let a retard paint a picture with his cock and then claim it's the best abstract and clever art there ever was "uh, this really sais something about sociaty!" :cool:


EDIT: All music is stupid and unintelligent if you find it stupid or unintelligent. Depends on the ear that hears it. Stupid discussion. Books, movies that tries to be clever is wankery too.. Everything is wankery!!! Wankery i tell you!!


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:43 pm 
Offline
Karma Whore
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 7:42 pm
Posts: 3581
Location: Cardiff, Wales
Quote:
isn't it wankery too, to call such ppl less intelligent just becuase they have painting skills? Imo, it's just as much wankery to let a retard paint a picture with his cock and then claim it's the best abstract and clever art there ever was "uh, this really sais something about sociaty!"


But in a way,it would say something about society. That being that people will say any old crap is the best thing ever to avoid looking stupid.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:48 pm 
Mintrude wrote:
Quote:
isn't it wankery too, to call such ppl less intelligent just becuase they have painting skills? Imo, it's just as much wankery to let a retard paint a picture with his cock and then claim it's the best abstract and clever art there ever was "uh, this really sais something about sociaty!"


But in a way,it would say something about society. That being that people will say any old crap is the best thing ever to avoid looking stupid.


isn't it the other way around? Ppl would say that it's better than the old crap to avoid looking stupid, to give the impression that they understand art and have a huge brain capacity that can deal with the abstract.

btw.. i like old "crap". It's less pretentious, and despite being more realistic it usually isn't as real as photo for good reasons. The real old crap has a rather distorted picture of reality when it comes sociaty in general, but pictures of nature on the other hand is more alive than a photo, and the nature painting is about expressing the beauty of nature or how raw it can be.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:03 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 6519
Location: USoA
Astaroth wrote:
following the reaper wrote:
Ive never thought of Arcturus as wanky :P

I find Darkspace to be wanky. Sounds like they are trying to break the mould of black metal, but its just so boring...


hmm... i don't find Darkspace to be wanky at all, neither boring.. (but Arcturus on the other hand).... Their first full-lenght album is awsome, and that is that - atmospheric, hypnotic and plain awsomeness. Besides, it's not like they are doing something completely different or new. Imo they just took some elements from Lunar Aurora and made them darker and more spacy.


I like Darkspace a lot and Arcturus a lot. I don't think they are remotely exclusive to each other.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:34 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 7:40 am
Posts: 13758
Location: Canada
Astaroth wrote:
Misha wrote:
Very much agreed. Wank is the equivalent of a technically extremely realistic painting. That does not make it good, nor art. It's usually less intelligent people with lots of practise that create such paintings/music.


isn't it wankery too, to call such ppl less intelligent just becuase they have painting skills? Imo, it's just as much wankery to let a retard paint a picture with his cock and then claim it's the best abstract and clever art there ever was "uh, this really sais something about sociaty!" :cool:

The problem here is that you're working in extremes. Abstract doesn't necessarily mean taking it to the extreme of painting something with your dick and attaching some meaning to it. I generally think of something like this:
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:40 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:41 am
Posts: 3731
Location: Veldhoven - The Netherlands
Image
Wankery?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:52 pm 
noodles wrote:
The problem here is that you're working in extremes. Abstract doesn't necessarily mean taking it to the extreme of painting something with your dick and attaching some meaning to it. I generally think of something like this:
Image


well... extreme yes, but i have seen lot's of "extreme abstract" art that was crap.

but according to my difiniton your example is not very abstract :wink: it has to be more symbolic and more confusing than that :P .. too easy to understand i think.


here's two examples of abstract art, guess which i find the lamest:

Image
Painted in 1915

Image
painted in 1924

i really don't like any of them... but i like this famous one:

Image
abstract and symbolic

of course.. i am aware of the fact that Mies will tell me in a minute how ignorant i am :D ha ha..


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:56 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:41 am
Posts: 3731
Location: Veldhoven - The Netherlands
I don't know the first painting, but those by Kandinsky and Picasso are really famous. I'm afraid it says more about your taste in art than anything about the general concensus.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:58 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 7:40 am
Posts: 13758
Location: Canada
Yeah the things that are like a blue background with a 3 green squares called like "distorted cow" are lame. The Kadinsky one is kinda cool though (i like the one Misha posted more).

roar!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 6:08 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 6810
Location: lolchair
Wow interesting thread. Let me blast some of my shallow opinions. Darkspace rules, Arturus is weird, Pig Destroyer rules, Converge rules, those painting there suck.


I think in this artsy metal category I like Blut Aus Nord the best. They were at the peak of their pretentiousness with TWWTG. Mort was meh. All bands people consider to be avant garde (which is Polish for artsy) bm are actually awesome bands.



Oh, a while ago some Turkish artist opened a gallery which had an interesting piece. A tissue with his sperm and some sucky poetry on it, preserved for 15 or so years. Some people thought it was awesome art who all deserve to die with shotguns, but a lot of people hated the guy for trying to pass his idiocy and nerdness as art. It was like a ripoff of that guy who showed a urinal as art some time ago. Which also wasn't art and was very stupid.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 6:23 pm 
Misha wrote:
I don't know the first painting, but those by Kandinsky and Picasso are really famous. I'm afraid it says more about your taste in art than anything about the general concensus.


and how is that? What does it say? :P I just gave examples on what i find to be abstract. I really don't care much about art in general, though, and don't know that much about it, really. But that doesn't mean i don't have a opinion on what i find abstract and what i find to be completely shit.

But you're right though. I like naturalistic, romantic art and sculptures etc the most for various reasons. And if that makes me an ignorant idiot, so be it ( i also like other types of paintings of course)... i like old classical music too.. uh!! i'm really naughty and stupid :dio: :cool:


Kathaarian wrote:
Oh, a while ago some Turkish artist opened a gallery which had an interesting piece. A tissue with his sperm and some sucky poetry on it, preserved for 15 or so years. Some people thought it was awesome art who all deserve to die with shotguns, but a lot of people hated the guy for trying to pass his idiocy and nerdness as art. It was like a ripoff of that guy who showed a urinal as art some time ago. Which also wasn't art and was very stupid.


ha ha :D


Last edited by Astaroth on Thu May 10, 2007 7:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 7:01 pm 
Offline
Karma Whore
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 7:42 pm
Posts: 3581
Location: Cardiff, Wales
Quote:
isn't it the other way around? Ppl would say that it's better than the old crap to avoid looking stupid, to give the impression that they understand art and have a huge brain capacity that can deal with the abstract.

btw.. i like old "crap". It's less pretentious, and despite being more realistic it usually isn't as real as photo for good reasons. The real old crap has a rather distorted picture of reality when it comes sociaty in general, but pictures of nature on the other hand is more alive than a photo, and the nature painting is about expressing the beauty of nature or how raw it can be.


I think you got the wrong end of the stick :wink:. What I was trying to say that getting a retard to paint with his dick, and everybody saying it was the best thing ever, would mean that, in a roundabout sort of way, it WOULD say something about society, that being that people will pretend to like the equivalent of me vomiting on a canvas to avoid looking stupid and "unsophisticated" Having said that abstract art can look good as decoration, where you don't have pretentious wankers commenting on it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 8:41 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:19 am
Posts: 8644
Location: Aberdeen
jackson pollock is bollocks.

_________________
I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 10:13 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:41 am
Posts: 3731
Location: Veldhoven - The Netherlands
Kathaarian wrote:
It was like a ripoff of that guy who showed a urinal as art some time ago. Which also wasn't art and was very stupid.

Did you mean Duchamp's Fountain? That's called Dadaism, and it's far more awesome than the state of Turkey.
Image

Sunn O))) leads directly back to dadaism (via classical minimalism, musical neo-dadaism and dadaism in the artistic sense before that).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 10:25 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:19 am
Posts: 8644
Location: Aberdeen
Back on topic, for some reason I find Henkka Klingenberg somewhat annoying... must be the rastas.

_________________
I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 10:30 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 7:40 am
Posts: 13758
Location: Canada
Kathaarian wrote:
Oh, a while ago some Turkish artist opened a gallery which had an interesting piece. A tissue with his sperm and some sucky poetry on it, preserved for 15 or so years. Some people thought it was awesome art who all deserve to die with shotguns, but a lot of people hated the guy for trying to pass his idiocy and nerdness as art. It was like a ripoff of that guy who showed a urinal as art some time ago. Which also wasn't art and was very stupid.

At least he admits that his art is masturbation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2007 12:57 am 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 29896
Location: UK
FrigidSymphony wrote:
jackson pollock is bollocks.


And here I must stop you. It's all in the way that you look at it - imagine the paint going onto the canvas in layers, building up to a finished piece rather than trying to take it all in at once. You may not understand it, but that doesn't mean you can't appreciate it.

Music is different, since you have to give more of yourself to it generally, but much of the arty music I like isn;t Metal, and much of the reason I like, say, Napalm Death is it's blunt heaviness. Not to say the two can't intertwine, but Metal does brutal better than artsy. And the opposite is true for non-metal.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 201 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 11  Next   


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group