Films watched recently... (CAUTION, SPOILERS)

cry of the banshee · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2009 3:02 am

AngelRipper16 wrote:

cry of the banshee wrote:

Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!
I have a mild fetish for the first half of the 60s... wierd, I know.

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to violence, the word and the act. While violence cloaks itself in a plethora of disguises, its favorite mantle still remains... sex. Violence devours all it touches, its voracious appetite rarely fulfilled. Yet violence doesn't only destroy, it creates and molds as well. Let's examine closely then this dangerously evil creation, this new breed encased and contained within the supple skin of woman. The softness is there, the unmistakable smell of female, the surface shiny and silken, the body yielding yet wanton. But a word of caution: handle with care and don't drop your guard. This rapacious new breed prowls both alone and in packs, operating at any level, any time, anywhere, and with anybody. Who are they? One might be your secretary, your doctor's receptionist... or a dancer in a go-go club!

What the fuck? You've definetely spent a few nights in front of the computer all by yourself.

FP!KK! is pretty tame stuff, dude, it was released in 1965... it's more over the top funny than anything else, no nudity or anything even approaching it in this one; now, later Russ Meyer films... that's a different story.
Don't see the connection.

cry of the banshee · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2009 3:05 am

AngelRipper16 wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

AngelRipper16 wrote:

cry of the banshee wrote:

Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!
I have a mild fetish for the first half of the 60s... wierd, I know.

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to violence, the word and the act. While violence cloaks itself in a plethora of disguises, its favorite mantle still remains... sex. Violence devours all it touches, its voracious appetite rarely fulfilled. Yet violence doesn't only destroy, it creates and molds as well. Let's examine closely then this dangerously evil creation, this new breed encased and contained within the supple skin of woman. The softness is there, the unmistakable smell of female, the surface shiny and silken, the body yielding yet wanton. But a word of caution: handle with care and don't drop your guard. This rapacious new breed prowls both alone and in packs, operating at any level, any time, anywhere, and with anybody. Who are they? One might be your secretary, your doctor's receptionist... or a dancer in a go-go club!

What the fuck? You've definetely spent a few nights in front of the computer all by yourself.

Or he likes old movies?

Did you even read what he posted? He likes old movies with... ah, if there only was a boobie-emoticon... :lol:

Old movies with well endowed females doesn't equate to spank fodder, my man, at least not to me.

Besides. I'm a married man, with kids.

DevotedWalnut · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2009 6:49 am

cry of the banshee wrote:

AngelRipper16 wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

AngelRipper16 wrote:

cry of the banshee wrote:

Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!
I have a mild fetish for the first half of the 60s... wierd, I know.

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to violence, the word and the act. While violence cloaks itself in a plethora of disguises, its favorite mantle still remains... sex. Violence devours all it touches, its voracious appetite rarely fulfilled. Yet violence doesn't only destroy, it creates and molds as well. Let's examine closely then this dangerously evil creation, this new breed encased and contained within the supple skin of woman. The softness is there, the unmistakable smell of female, the surface shiny and silken, the body yielding yet wanton. But a word of caution: handle with care and don't drop your guard. This rapacious new breed prowls both alone and in packs, operating at any level, any time, anywhere, and with anybody. Who are they? One might be your secretary, your doctor's receptionist... or a dancer in a go-go club!

What the fuck? You've definetely spent a few nights in front of the computer all by yourself.

Or he likes old movies?

Did you even read what he posted? He likes old movies with... ah, if there only was a boobie-emoticon... :lol:

Old movies with well endowed females doesn't equate to spank fodder, my man, at least not to me.

Besides. I'm a married man, with kids.

He's young. He sees tits on screen and covers his eyes. Then wakes up at 3 am with an enormous erection.

DevotedWalnut · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2009 6:49 am

The Dogs of War

goddamn, Christopher Walken is one crazy motherfucker.

cry of the banshee · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2009 7:12 am

DevotedWalnut wrote:

cry of the banshee wrote:

AngelRipper16 wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

AngelRipper16 wrote:

cry of the banshee wrote:

Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!
I have a mild fetish for the first half of the 60s... wierd, I know.

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to violence, the word and the act. While violence cloaks itself in a plethora of disguises, its favorite mantle still remains... sex. Violence devours all it touches, its voracious appetite rarely fulfilled. Yet violence doesn't only destroy, it creates and molds as well. Let's examine closely then this dangerously evil creation, this new breed encased and contained within the supple skin of woman. The softness is there, the unmistakable smell of female, the surface shiny and silken, the body yielding yet wanton. But a word of caution: handle with care and don't drop your guard. This rapacious new breed prowls both alone and in packs, operating at any level, any time, anywhere, and with anybody. Who are they? One might be your secretary, your doctor's receptionist... or a dancer in a go-go club!

What the fuck? You've definetely spent a few nights in front of the computer all by yourself.

Or he likes old movies?

Did you even read what he posted? He likes old movies with... ah, if there only was a boobie-emoticon... :lol:

Old movies with well endowed females doesn't equate to spank fodder, my man, at least not to me.

Besides. I'm a married man, with kids.

He's young. He sees tits on screen and covers his eyes. Then wakes up at 3 am with an enormous erection.

Thomas · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2009 10:47 am

The Mist - Sucked major
The Hills Have Eyes 2 - Sucked even more

cry of the banshee · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2009 6:53 pm

DevotedWalnut wrote:

The Dogs of War

goddamn, Christopher Walken is one crazy motherfucker.

You ever see McBain?

AlexandeR · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2009 8:11 pm

Angels & Demons

Pretty entertaining.

traptunderice · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2009 9:41 pm

cry of the banshee wrote:

Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!
I have a mild fetish for the first half of the 60s... wierd, I know.

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to violence, the word and the act. While violence cloaks itself in a plethora of disguises, its favorite mantle still remains... sex. Violence devours all it touches, its voracious appetite rarely fulfilled. Yet violence doesn't only destroy, it creates and molds as well. Let's examine closely then this dangerously evil creation, this new breed encased and contained within the supple skin of woman. The softness is there, the unmistakable smell of female, the surface shiny and silken, the body yielding yet wanton. But a word of caution: handle with care and don't drop your guard. This rapacious new breed prowls both alone and in packs, operating at any level, any time, anywhere, and with anybody. Who are they? One might be your secretary, your doctor's receptionist... or a dancer in a go-go club!

Loved that movie. The old girlfriend never looked at me the same after I made her watch it.

DevotedWalnut · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2009 9:44 pm

cry of the banshee wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

The Dogs of War

goddamn, Christopher Walken is one crazy motherfucker.

You ever see McBain?

No. But i'm guessing I should.

cry of the banshee · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2009 9:50 pm

traptunderice wrote:

cry of the banshee wrote:

Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!
I have a mild fetish for the first half of the 60s... wierd, I know.

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to violence, the word and the act. While violence cloaks itself in a plethora of disguises, its favorite mantle still remains... sex. Violence devours all it touches, its voracious appetite rarely fulfilled. Yet violence doesn't only destroy, it creates and molds as well. Let's examine closely then this dangerously evil creation, this new breed encased and contained within the supple skin of woman. The softness is there, the unmistakable smell of female, the surface shiny and silken, the body yielding yet wanton. But a word of caution: handle with care and don't drop your guard. This rapacious new breed prowls both alone and in packs, operating at any level, any time, anywhere, and with anybody. Who are they? One might be your secretary, your doctor's receptionist... or a dancer in a go-go club!

Loved that movie. The old girlfriend never looked at me the same after I made her watch it.

Yeah, it definitely has it's charms... especially Haji sneering all over the place with that bad Italian accent...
haha!

cry of the banshee · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2009 9:55 pm

DevotedWalnut wrote:

cry of the banshee wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

The Dogs of War

goddamn, Christopher Walken is one crazy motherfucker.

You ever see McBain?

No. But i'm guessing I should.

Haha, ya gotta see it to believe it.

http://www.ruthlessreviews.com/1137/mcbain/

Goat · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2009 10:02 pm

cry of the banshee wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

cry of the banshee wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

The Dogs of War

goddamn, Christopher Walken is one crazy motherfucker.

You ever see McBain?

No. But i'm guessing I should.

Haha, ya gotta see it to believe it.

http://www.ruthlessreviews.com/1137/mcbain/

Heh, sounds great. I must watch more 80s films, they're usually better than the modern equivalent.

DevotedWalnut · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2009 10:06 pm

cry of the banshee wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

cry of the banshee wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

The Dogs of War

goddamn, Christopher Walken is one crazy motherfucker.

You ever see McBain?

No. But i'm guessing I should.

Haha, ya gotta see it to believe it.

http://www.ruthlessreviews.com/1137/mcbain/

Oh my. Must see.

noodles · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2009 10:58 pm

Lie To Me - Not great but better than I expected. Pretty much how I'd expect an open relationship to go.

Blindness - Great movie, especially the soundtrack. Neat Lord of the Flies-ish scenario. I guess it could have ended closer to when they get out of the prison, but it worked to have the story round off nicely.

Azrael · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2009 11:44 pm

so i was wandering around Wikipedia and ran into this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_of_the_Blind_(film)

Quote:

Land of the Blind is a dark political satire, based on several incidents throughout history in which tyrannical rulers were overthrown by new leaders who proved to be just as bad, if not worse, and subtle references are made to several such cases. The title is taken from the saying "In the Land of the Blind, the one-eyed man is King".

"Land of the Blind" had its world premiere in competition at the International Film Festival Rotterdam, and was the Opening Night Gala film at the 2006 Human Rights Watch Film Festival in London. Its U.S. premiere was in competition at the 2006 Tribeca Film Festival. The film sparked intense reaction during its festival run, attacked by both left and right, each of which saw the film as a critique of its position.

Other historical references in the film include Jean-Paul Marat (from the French Revolution), Kim Jong-Il, Fidel Castro, Benito Mussolini, Augusto Pinochet, François Duvalier, Rudolph Hess, Jean-Claude Duvalier, Lyndon B. Johnson, Julius Caesar (from William Shakespeare's play), Robert Mugabe, Idi Amin, the PIRA Maze prison protests, U.S. POWs in Vietnam, the Weathermen terrorist group, the Khmer Rouge, the 1979 Revolution in Iran and the subsequent Cultural Revolution.

seems quite interesting, anyone here seen it?

Goat · **Posted:** Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:19 am

Azrael wrote:

so i was wandering around Wikipedia and ran into this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_of_the_Blind_(film)

Quote:

Land of the Blind is a dark political satire, based on several incidents throughout history in which tyrannical rulers were overthrown by new leaders who proved to be just as bad, if not worse, and subtle references are made to several such cases. The title is taken from the saying "In the Land of the Blind, the one-eyed man is King".

"Land of the Blind" had its world premiere in competition at the International Film Festival Rotterdam, and was the Opening Night Gala film at the 2006 Human Rights Watch Film Festival in London. Its U.S. premiere was in competition at the 2006 Tribeca Film Festival. The film sparked intense reaction during its festival run, attacked by both left and right, each of which saw the film as a critique of its position.

Other historical references in the film include Jean-Paul Marat (from the French Revolution), Kim Jong-Il, Fidel Castro, Benito Mussolini, Augusto Pinochet, François Duvalier, Rudolph Hess, Jean-Claude Duvalier, Lyndon B. Johnson, Julius Caesar (from William Shakespeare's play), Robert Mugabe, Idi Amin, the PIRA Maze prison protests, U.S. POWs in Vietnam, the Weathermen terrorist group, the Khmer Rouge, the 1979 Revolution in Iran and the subsequent Cultural Revolution.

seems quite interesting, anyone here seen it?

I've seen it. The whole point is that revolutions can provide equally tyrannical rulers, and unless you're interested in seeing a film tell that story at length... it was OK, nothing that great.

traptunderice · **Posted:** Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:32 am

^Pacify populaces much. What about all the revolutions that did turn out positive? American, British(to some degree), Indian. That sounds like some bullshit conservative ideology trojan horse to me.

Goat · **Posted:** Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:45 am

traptunderice wrote:

^Pacify populaces much. What about all the revolutions that did turn out positive? American, British(to some degree), Indian. That sounds like some bullshit conservative ideology trojan horse to me.

Violence begets violence, whether it's Cromwell massacring the Irish or sectarian Indian violence. I'm not going to comment on the American revolution, because that's an open trapdoor. Personally, I'm nonviolent up to the usual boundaries. The French and Russian revolutions are good enough examples.

traptunderice · **Posted:** Mon Jun 01, 2009 2:21 am

Goat wrote:

traptunderice wrote:

^Pacify populaces much. What about all the revolutions that did turn out positive? American, British(to some degree), Indian. That sounds like some bullshit conservative ideology trojan horse to me.

Violence begets violence, whether it's Cromwell massacring the Irish or sectarian Indian violence. I'm not going to comment on the American revolution, because that's an open trapdoor. Personally, I'm nonviolent up to the usual boundaries. The French and Russian revolutions are good enough examples.

Sitting around and doing nothing begets violence as well so trying to fight systemic violence is worth any damages caused by a revolution. The French, American, Russian and Indian revolutions were all enlightening to some degree despite the damages caused; without them where would we be? Violence is prevalent in our society so why not direct that violence towards something you can support and be proud of. It beats sitting around and letting the violence of capitalism, neo-colonialism and social injustices simply be condoned.

Metal Reviews

Films watched recently... (CAUTION, SPOILERS)

Who is online