Goatwhore - Carving Out the Eyes of God (#5496)

stevelovesmoonspell · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:40 am

hes a fanboy we will all feel his wrath!

AlexandeR · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:41 am

stevelovesmoonspell wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

Thrashtilldeth wrote:

I didn't want to start a whole thread, so i'll just jump into this bitchfight to say, maybe too much black metal going on the reviews this week?

Now, i'm not one of these psychos who thinks you guys need to review every thrash release ever. But this week there were 22 reviews, and 13 of them had the word "black" in the description somewhere, while 0 had "thrash".

Just saying, s'all.

That's because Black owns Thrash.

fail

No, you fail my friend. We'all know that Black owns Thrash. Make a poll and you'll see the results :wink:

so your saying shitty bands like Xasthur, Vlad tepes, Immortal and Mutilation are better then Morbid Saint or Sadus? Your a funny guy

Immortal is shitty? You've lost all your credibility...

DevotedWalnut · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:42 am

AlexandeR wrote:

stevelovesmoonspell wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

Thrashtilldeth wrote:

I didn't want to start a whole thread, so i'll just jump into this bitchfight to say, maybe too much black metal going on the reviews this week?

Now, i'm not one of these psychos who thinks you guys need to review every thrash release ever. But this week there were 22 reviews, and 13 of them had the word "black" in the description somewhere, while 0 had "thrash".

Just saying, s'all.

That's because Black owns Thrash.

fail

No, you fail my friend. We'all know that Black owns Thrash. Make a poll and you'll see the results :wink:

so your saying shitty bands like Xasthur, Vlad tepes, Immortal and Mutilation are better then Morbid Saint or Sadus? Your a funny guy

Immortal is shitty? You've lost all your credibility...

shitty when compared to Morbid Saint or Sadus.

stevelovesmoonspell · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:42 am

AlexandeR wrote:

stevelovesmoonspell wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

Thrashtilldeth wrote:

I didn't want to start a whole thread, so i'll just jump into this bitchfight to say, maybe too much black metal going on the reviews this week?

Now, i'm not one of these psychos who thinks you guys need to review every thrash release ever. But this week there were 22 reviews, and 13 of them had the word "black" in the description somewhere, while 0 had "thrash".

Just saying, s'all.

That's because Black owns Thrash.

fail

No, you fail my friend. We'all know that Black owns Thrash. Make a poll and you'll see the results :wink:

so your saying shitty bands like Xasthur, Vlad tepes, Immortal and Mutilation are better then Morbid Saint or Sadus? Your a funny guy

Immortal is shitty? You've lost all your credibility...

they are shitty dude.

AlexandeR · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:43 am

DevotedWalnut wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

Thrashtilldeth wrote:

I didn't want to start a whole thread, so i'll just jump into this bitchfight to say, maybe too much black metal going on the reviews this week?

Now, i'm not one of these psychos who thinks you guys need to review every thrash release ever. But this week there were 22 reviews, and 13 of them had the word "black" in the description somewhere, while 0 had "thrash".

Just saying, s'all.

That's because Black owns Thrash.

fail

No, you fail my friend. We'all know that Black owns Thrash. Make a poll and you'll see the results :wink:

And what would that poll accomplish? That there are more black metal fans on this site? Big friggin' deal.

There are more people on this site who like Paramore or Michael Jackson over thrash. So I don't really care what most of these people have to say...

That's a good point. Maybe will see a MJ review in the next weeks.

AlexandeR · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:44 am

DevotedWalnut wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

stevelovesmoonspell wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

Thrashtilldeth wrote:

I didn't want to start a whole thread, so i'll just jump into this bitchfight to say, maybe too much black metal going on the reviews this week?

Now, i'm not one of these psychos who thinks you guys need to review every thrash release ever. But this week there were 22 reviews, and 13 of them had the word "black" in the description somewhere, while 0 had "thrash".

Just saying, s'all.

That's because Black owns Thrash.

fail

No, you fail my friend. We'all know that Black owns Thrash. Make a poll and you'll see the results :wink:

so your saying shitty bands like Xasthur, Vlad tepes, Immortal and Mutilation are better then Morbid Saint or Sadus? Your a funny guy

Immortal is shitty? You've lost all your credibility...

shitty when compared to Morbid Saint or Sadus.

What's this alliance between you and stevie? :blink:

stevelovesmoonspell · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:44 am

AlexandeR wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

Thrashtilldeth wrote:

I didn't want to start a whole thread, so i'll just jump into this bitchfight to say, maybe too much black metal going on the reviews this week?

Now, i'm not one of these psychos who thinks you guys need to review every thrash release ever. But this week there were 22 reviews, and 13 of them had the word "black" in the description somewhere, while 0 had "thrash".

Just saying, s'all.

That's because Black owns Thrash.

fail

No, you fail my friend. We'all know that Black owns Thrash. Make a poll and you'll see the results :wink:

And what would that poll accomplish? That there are more black metal fans on this site? Big friggin' deal.

There are more people on this site who like Paramore or Michael Jackson over thrash. So I don't really care what most of these people have to say...

That's a good point. Maybe will see a MJ review in the next weeks.

well since Billy Idol and Paramore are reviewed here, I don't see why not.
Maybe Charles could review it considering he can't review Behexen or Goatwhore.

stevelovesmoonspell · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:45 am

AlexandeR wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

stevelovesmoonspell wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

Thrashtilldeth wrote:

I didn't want to start a whole thread, so i'll just jump into this bitchfight to say, maybe too much black metal going on the reviews this week?

Now, i'm not one of these psychos who thinks you guys need to review every thrash release ever. But this week there were 22 reviews, and 13 of them had the word "black" in the description somewhere, while 0 had "thrash".

Just saying, s'all.

That's because Black owns Thrash.

fail

No, you fail my friend. We'all know that Black owns Thrash. Make a poll and you'll see the results :wink:

so your saying shitty bands like Xasthur, Vlad tepes, Immortal and Mutilation are better then Morbid Saint or Sadus? Your a funny guy

Immortal is shitty? You've lost all your credibility...

shitty when compared to Morbid Saint or Sadus.

What's this alliance between you and stevie? :blink:

I am not allied with him in anyway, he just disagrees with your statement about black> thrash as do I.

DevotedWalnut · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:46 am

AlexandeR wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

stevelovesmoonspell wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

Thrashtilldeth wrote:

I didn't want to start a whole thread, so i'll just jump into this bitchfight to say, maybe too much black metal going on the reviews this week?

Now, i'm not one of these psychos who thinks you guys need to review every thrash release ever. But this week there were 22 reviews, and 13 of them had the word "black" in the description somewhere, while 0 had "thrash".

Just saying, s'all.

That's because Black owns Thrash.

fail

No, you fail my friend. We'all know that Black owns Thrash. Make a poll and you'll see the results :wink:

so your saying shitty bands like Xasthur, Vlad tepes, Immortal and Mutilation are better then Morbid Saint or Sadus? Your a funny guy

Immortal is shitty? You've lost all your credibility...

shitty when compared to Morbid Saint or Sadus.

What's this alliance between you and stevie? :blink:

No alliance, just protecting my love. (Morbid Saint, Sadus, thrash metal, etc...)

stevelovesmoonspell · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:55 am

Thrashtildeth · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:55 am

AlexandeR wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

stevelovesmoonspell wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

Thrashtilldeth wrote:

I didn't want to start a whole thread, so i'll just jump into this bitchfight to say, maybe too much black metal going on the reviews this week?

Now, i'm not one of these psychos who thinks you guys need to review every thrash release ever. But this week there were 22 reviews, and 13 of them had the word "black" in the description somewhere, while 0 had "thrash".

Just saying, s'all.

That's because Black owns Thrash.

fail

No, you fail my friend. We'all know that Black owns Thrash. Make a poll and you'll see the results :wink:

so your saying shitty bands like Xasthur, Vlad tepes, Immortal and Mutilation are better then Morbid Saint or Sadus? Your a funny guy

Immortal is shitty? You've lost all your credibility...

shitty when compared to Morbid Saint or Sadus.

What's this alliance between you and stevie? :blink:

You can't make some retarded blanket statement like "black metal owns thrash" and not spur any hatred.

You just can't be that definitive.

Goat · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:14 am

Speaking of retarded blanket statements, saying that Charles can't review for shit or that Immortal are shitty certainly show that there's a lot of shit-talking going on.

Thrashtildeth · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:26 am

True.

But, thankfully, I didn't say any of those things. So I can still feel justified in making smug comments about retarded blanket statements.

Adam · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:38 am

I'd like to thank lil' steve for bringing absolutely nothing to this thread. Let's see, you attacked Charles unprovoked, made flamebaiting statements about black metal, and shit on Gorguts?! Not one post adding anything to the discussion of this album. You know, Goatwhore? The band this thread is supposed to be about?

Consider this a friendly admonishment, and the last one you'll get. Your act is getting very tired, very quickly. Try thinking before you post instead of just bashing every band, reviewer, and genre you can think of in the hopes of making a scene.

DevotedWalnut · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 3:42 am

Adam wrote:

I'd like to thank lil' steve for bringing absolutely nothing to this thread. Let's see, you attacked Charles unprovoked, made flamebaiting statements about black metal, and shit on Gorguts?! Not one post adding anything to the discussion of this album. You know, Goatwhore? The band this thread is supposed to be about?

Consider this a friendly admonishment, and the last one you'll get. Your act is getting very tired, very quickly. Try thinking before you post instead of just bashing every band, reviewer, and genre you can think of in the hopes of making a scene.

You tell him Adam!

:wub:

dont get mad at me...

Eternal Idol · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:49 am

C'mon a 65 isn't even a bad score, and neither is this band. It's just nothing groundbreaking, sort of middle of the road. That's not really a bad thing, it just means it doesn't do much to stand out in a gigantic sea of metal bands.

rio · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:26 am

stevelovesmoonspell wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

DevotedWalnut wrote:

AlexandeR wrote:

Thrashtilldeth wrote:

I didn't want to start a whole thread, so i'll just jump into this bitchfight to say, maybe too much black metal going on the reviews this week?

Now, i'm not one of these psychos who thinks you guys need to review every thrash release ever. But this week there were 22 reviews, and 13 of them had the word "black" in the description somewhere, while 0 had "thrash".

Just saying, s'all.

That's because Black owns Thrash.

fail

No, you fail my friend. We'all know that Black owns Thrash. Make a poll and you'll see the results :wink:

And what would that poll accomplish? That there are more black metal fans on this site? Big friggin' deal.

There are more people on this site who like Paramore or Michael Jackson over thrash. So I don't really care what most of these people have to say...

That's a good point. Maybe will see a MJ review in the next weeks.

well since Billy Idol and Paramore are reviewed here, I don't see why not.
Maybe Charles could review it considering he can't review Behexen or Goatwhore.

Jesus Christ what a fucking failure :lol:

Go fuck yourself, dumbass.

Thrashtilldeth wrote:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the general feel of the review seems to be: "the music is more or less fine, worthy of a few headbangs.... but it just isn't evil enough."

That's exactly the problem, you are correct. Why should something that is "more or less fine", get more than a medium score?

rio · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:04 am

stevelovesmoonspell wrote:

this guy pretty much fails at reviewing black metal, Taake, Archgoat, Teratism, Blut Aus Nord, all middle of the road scores.

By the way, it's slightly difficult to know how to respond to this...

For a start, I gave Blut Aus Nord an 80 / 100, you buffoon. And I'd be fascinated to hear why you think Teratism, of all bands, deserve more than 65. Especially given that you conspicuously failed to make that point at the time. This wouldn't just be retrospective nitpicking because the big bad reviewer gave some band you like a lower score than you, would it?

Goat · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:17 am

rio wrote:

stevelovesmoonspell wrote:

this guy pretty much fails at reviewing black metal, Taake, Archgoat, Teratism, Blut Aus Nord, all middle of the road scores.

By the way, it's slightly difficult to know how to respond to this...

For a start, I gave Blut Aus Nord an 80 / 100, you buffoon. And I'd be fascinated to hear why you think Teratism, of all bands, deserve more than 65. Especially given that you conspicuously failed to make that point at the time. This wouldn't just be retrospective nitpicking because the big bad reviewer gave some band you like a lower score than you, would it?

Heh, I think he just went through your reviews, picking out the mid-level scores. Steve's nowhere near krieg enough to have even heard of Teratism.

rio · **Posted:** Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:30 am

Goat wrote:

rio wrote:

stevelovesmoonspell wrote:

this guy pretty much fails at reviewing black metal, Taake, Archgoat, Teratism, Blut Aus Nord, all middle of the road scores.

By the way, it's slightly difficult to know how to respond to this...

For a start, I gave Blut Aus Nord an 80 / 100, you buffoon. And I'd be fascinated to hear why you think Teratism, of all bands, deserve more than 65. Especially given that you conspicuously failed to make that point at the time. This wouldn't just be retrospective nitpicking because the big bad reviewer gave some band you like a lower score than you, would it?

Heh, I think he just went through your reviews, picking out the mid-level scores. Steve's nowhere near krieg enough to have even heard of Teratism.

So, what you're saying is, I have overestimated Stevelovesmoonspell?

I didn't think such a thing were possible, but here we are. :lol:

Metal Reviews

Goatwhore - Carving Out the Eyes of God (#5496)

Who is online