Disappointments of 2009

wild_child · **Joined:** Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:45 pm **Posts:** 134

Supremist wrote:

wild_child wrote:

Supremist wrote:

wild_child wrote:

pearl jam, it was pop rock bull shit

What?

I think it's their best album since Vitalogy.
.

its shit and best since vitalogy isnt much of an accomplishment for them becuase they've been releasing a lot of filler with a few good songs on most of those albums. Pearl Jam is one of my favourite bands but they've sold out. the only good song on that album is the end.
Then i see what AiC comes out with that blows them out of the water missing a band member (RIP Layne) Black gives way to blue Suprise of the year positive and Back spacer supriseof the year negitive

Pearl Jam clearly isn't one of your favorite bands or you don't like music much. I think they released a sting of average albums from Binaural to Avocado but the rest is pretty great.

you must having hearing disabilities from no code to backspacer i couldn't find 11 songs to make a CD better than Ten and backspacer is the worst out of all of them.
the only good thing they've done in those years is /03 live at the garden which is an amazing effort for a live show that amazes every listen, the solo on even flow is amazing

listen to this : PEARL JAM IS ON A DOWNWARD SLIDE, THEY CAN'T COMPETE WITH THEIR EARLY WORK BY RELEASING THIS BULL SHIT FOR THE RADIO

TheOctavarius · **Posted:** Sun Nov 15, 2009 7:33 pm

wild_child wrote:

Supremist wrote:

wild_child wrote:

Supremist wrote:

wild_child wrote:

pearl jam, it was pop rock bull shit

What?

I think it's their best album since Vitalogy.
.

its shit and best since vitalogy isnt much of an accomplishment for them becuase they've been releasing a lot of filler with a few good songs on most of those albums. Pearl Jam is one of my favourite bands but they've sold out. the only good song on that album is the end.
Then i see what AiC comes out with that blows them out of the water missing a band member (RIP Layne) Black gives way to blue Suprise of the year positive and Back spacer supriseof the year negitive

Pearl Jam clearly isn't one of your favorite bands or you don't like music much. I think they released a sting of average albums from Binaural to Avocado but the rest is pretty great.

you must having hearing disabilities from no code to backspacer i couldn't find 11 songs to make a CD better than Ten and backspacer is the worst out of all of them.
the only good thing they've done in those years is /03 live at the garden which is an amazing effort for a live show that amazes every listen, the solo on even flow is amazing

listen to this : PEARL JAM IS ON A DOWNWARD SLIDE, THEY CAN'T COMPETE WITH THEIR EARLY WORK BY RELEASING THIS BULL SHIT FOR THE RADIO

Lawl. And grunge, back then, wasn't 'bullshit' for the radio?

wild_child · **Joined:** Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:45 pm **Posts:** 134

TheOctavarius wrote:

wild_child wrote:

Supremist wrote:

wild_child wrote:

Supremist wrote:

wild_child wrote:

pearl jam, it was pop rock bull shit

What?

I think it's their best album since Vitalogy.
.

its shit and best since vitalogy isnt much of an accomplishment for them becuase they've been releasing a lot of filler with a few good songs on most of those albums. Pearl Jam is one of my favourite bands but they've sold out. the only good song on that album is the end.
Then i see what AiC comes out with that blows them out of the water missing a band member (RIP Layne) Black gives way to blue Suprise of the year positive and Back spacer supriseof the year negitive

Pearl Jam clearly isn't one of your favorite bands or you don't like music much. I think they released a sting of average albums from Binaural to Avocado but the rest is pretty great.

you must having hearing disabilities from no code to backspacer i couldn't find 11 songs to make a CD better than Ten and backspacer is the worst out of all of them.
the only good thing they've done in those years is /03 live at the garden which is an amazing effort for a live show that amazes every listen, the solo on even flow is amazing

listen to this : PEARL JAM IS ON A DOWNWARD SLIDE, THEY CAN'T COMPETE WITH THEIR EARLY WORK BY RELEASING THIS BULL SHIT FOR THE RADIO

Lawl. And grunge, back then, wasn't 'bullshit' for the radio?

back then grunge wasn't next to music mmade by some fatass man behind a mixing board thinking of how to make every song cover i'm rich, im black, i bang whores and you should try to be like me

Supremist · **Joined:** Mon Nov 09, 2009 10:59 pm **Posts:** 61

wild_child wrote:

Supremist wrote:

wild_child wrote:

Supremist wrote:

wild_child wrote:

pearl jam, it was pop rock bull shit

What?

I think it's their best album since Vitalogy.
.

its shit and best since vitalogy isnt much of an accomplishment for them becuase they've been releasing a lot of filler with a few good songs on most of those albums. Pearl Jam is one of my favourite bands but they've sold out. the only good song on that album is the end.
Then i see what AiC comes out with that blows them out of the water missing a band member (RIP Layne) Black gives way to blue Suprise of the year positive and Back spacer supriseof the year negitive

Pearl Jam clearly isn't one of your favorite bands or you don't like music much. I think they released a sting of average albums from Binaural to Avocado but the rest is pretty great.

you must having hearing disabilities from no code to backspacer i couldn't find 11 songs to make a CD better than Ten and backspacer is the worst out of all of them.
the only good thing they've done in those years is /03 live at the garden which is an amazing effort for a live show that amazes every listen, the solo on even flow is amazing

listen to this : PEARL JAM IS ON A DOWNWARD SLIDE, THEY CAN'T COMPETE WITH THEIR EARLY WORK BY RELEASING THIS BULL SHIT FOR THE RADIO

This proves my point. Thank you and goodbye.

Goat · **Posted:** Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:37 am

wild_child wrote:

back then grunge wasn't next to music mmade by some fatass man behind a mixing board thinking of how to make every song cover i'm rich, im black, i bang whores and you should try to be like me

White men have been singing about that for years.

Quote:

This proves my point. Thank you and goodbye.

It proves nothing. PJ have made plenty of great songs post-No Code, and that you can't find any on Backspacer says more about your crappy hearing than the band, since it's full of them.

Mike · **Posted:** Tue Nov 17, 2009 3:39 am

I really haven't had any album (that I was looking forward to) really disappoint me this year. Some were average but I still found enough redeeming value to keep my interest and not pronounce anything a total steaming pile of shit.

OK, I can think of one. Primal Fear's '16.6 (Before The Devil Knows You're Dead)'.

wild_child · **Joined:** Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:45 pm **Posts:** 134

Goat:
This new pearl hjam sucks ass put together 11 songs that are better than the 11 on ten and i might listen to you
Supremist: how does that prove your point? me saying that there AREN'T 11 good enough songs to make an album that rivals ten in their whole discography

Supremist · **Joined:** Mon Nov 09, 2009 10:59 pm **Posts:** 61

wild_child wrote:

Goat:
This new pearl hjam sucks ass put together 11 songs that are better than the 11 on ten and i might listen to you
Supremist: how does that prove your point? me saying that there AREN'T 11 good enough songs to make an album that rivals ten in their whole discography

It proves that you don't like PJ as much as you pretend you do.
Basically, you love Ten and that's about all.
I think Ten is quite overrated and hasn't aged well by the way.

Goat wrote:

Quote:

This proves my point. Thank you and goodbye.

It proves nothing. PJ have made plenty of great songs post-No Code, and that you can't find any on Backspacer says more about your crappy hearing than the band, since it's full of them.

Huh?

My point was that he didn't really like PJ... I was the one defending the overall quality of their work and Backspace in particular...
I realize that you don't what I posted but it's no reason to read my posts wrong... :wink:

wild_child · **Joined:** Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:45 pm **Posts:** 134

Supremist wrote:

wild_child wrote:

Goat:
This new pearl hjam sucks ass put together 11 songs that are better than the 11 on ten and i might listen to you
Supremist: how does that prove your point? me saying that there AREN'T 11 good enough songs to make an album that rivals ten in their whole discography

It proves that you don't like PJ as much as you pretend you do.
Basically, you love Ten and that's about all.
I think Ten is quite overrated and hasn't aged well by the way.

Goat wrote:

Quote:

This proves my point. Thank you and goodbye.

It proves nothing. PJ have made plenty of great songs post-No Code, and that you can't find any on Backspacer says more about your crappy hearing than the band, since it's full of them.

Huh?

My point was that he didn't really like PJ... I was the one defending the overall quality of their work and Backspace in particular...
I realize that you don't what I posted but it's no reason to read my posts wrong... :wink:

I really like pearl jam backspacer is horrible and most of their other albums are saved from being absolutely torn up by a song or two
come on do people honestly think "the fixer" is so good that it needs to be played on the radio 10 times a day?

Goat · **Posted:** Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:33 pm

Your mistake there is listening to the radio.

wild_child · **Joined:** Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:45 pm **Posts:** 134

Goat wrote:

Your mistake there is listening to the radio.

it just on where i am
im still waiting for the list

Goat · **Posted:** Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:41 pm

Did I say Ten wasn't PJ's best? No. But their albums afterwards are still full of great stuff.

wild_child · **Joined:** Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:45 pm **Posts:** 134

Goat wrote:

Did I say Ten wasn't PJ's best? No. But their albums afterwards are still full of great stuff.

what i'm saying is most of pearl jam's albums after Ten are solid to good (70-85 considering ten classic) but backspacer is the worst yet(65) and its pathetic when pearl jam can release B sides from Ten that are btter than a new album when those B sides aren't that great. I'm also saying since Vitology they've been getting progressivley and couldn't pull 11 songs from their discography past vitology to make a better CD then Ten. To close when readers look at this site they'll see Backspacer as just a little worse than dirt. theres something wrong there.

Goat · **Posted:** Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:57 pm

Well clearly we disagree in our opinions of Backspacer.

wild_child · **Joined:** Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:45 pm **Posts:** 134

Goat wrote:

Well clearly we disagree in our opinions of Backspacer.

I guess i don't want to troll or start stuff so we should just leave it as is. maybe better for another topic but why'd you score BGWtB, facelift and dirt so low? just not a AiC fan?

Goat · **Posted:** Tue Nov 17, 2009 11:02 pm

wild_child wrote:

Goat wrote:

Well clearly we disagree in our opinions of Backspacer.

I guess i don't want to troll or start stuff so we should just leave it as is. maybe better for another topic but why'd you score BGWtB, facelift and dirt so low? just not a AiC fan?

Well, I gave Dirt an 87, which is a pretty good score, and didn't think the others were as good, marking as appropriate. Facelift especially I find overrated. I didn't score them THAT different from the other reviewers, though.

wild_child · **Joined:** Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:45 pm **Posts:** 134

Goat wrote:

wild_child wrote:

Goat wrote:

Well clearly we disagree in our opinions of Backspacer.

I guess i don't want to troll or start stuff so we should just leave it as is. maybe better for another topic but why'd you score BGWtB, facelift and dirt so low? just not a AiC fan?

Well, I gave Dirt an 87, which is a pretty good score, and didn't think the others were as good, marking as appropriate. Facelift especially I find overrated. I didn't score them THAT different from the other reviewers, though.

on face lift you were 17 below adam and khelek

maybe it's just me but i think ten and dirt are classics

Goat · **Posted:** Tue Nov 17, 2009 11:11 pm

Each to his own. Hopefully I wrote about the articles in question with enough wit and verve to enable the mollification of petitioners alarmed at the said pieces of art lacking la status classique.

wild_child · **Joined:** Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:45 pm **Posts:** 134

Goat wrote:

Each to his own. Hopefully I wrote about the articles in question with enough wit and verve to enable the mollification of petitioners alarmed at the said pieces of art lacking la status classique.

you do a great job writing your many reviews. espiecially dirt despite how i disagree with the score

traptunderice · **Posted:** Wed Nov 18, 2009 3:39 am

If ten isn't reviewed it should be a classic.

Metal Reviews

Disappointments of 2009

Who is online