cry of the banshee wrote:
Fair worker representation has been surpassed into what is basically politically backed extortion long ago, though. Can paying someone with nothing more (sometimes less) than a High School degree $40+ / hour to push a button on cue really be justified?
Along with all the usual perks, of course. Add incompetent CEOs making literally $$$MILLIONS in bonuses alone, and companies shipping jobs overseas, across the border (thanks in part to your local union's demanding more than a fair wage; of course corporate greed plays it's role, as well) and voila! you have disaster. Is it really any wonder the once middle-class majority is receding into an ever lower standard of living? Unemployment is the worst it's been in nearly 30 years.
Unions (along with corporate greed and self-rewarding incompetence) are part of the problem; they have been corrupted, ironically, by greed.
Two parasites feeding off of each other.
I would guess that you have very little actual evidence for any of this besides the odd out-of-proportion story here and there. That's aside from the highly dubious point about a "fair wage". What is that? And which particular groups of union members are earning above it?
Blaming unions for US companies moving manufacturing abroad is pretty cheeky when it's the unions who are pretty much the only people who have been fighting tooth and nail against outsourcing since time immemorial. Unless your reasoning is that they forced those poor, poor multinational corporations to go looking for a workforce that was less likely to stand up to them?
Labour is cheaper abroad than in the US (unless it is undocumented migrant labour), so unless you would prefer US workers to be doing the same hours for the same wages as, say, a Chinese or Bangladeshi worker, don't blame the unions for outsourcing. Why not join them on their next protest against it? Or buy union-label stuff?
Quote:
As for the idea that a minimum wage is the solution: there already is one.
See my last two posts (including the very one you just quoted).
Quote:
We have a vast supply of slave labor at our disposal already. They're called prisoners. Put them to work in the fields and on the roads; make them earn their three hots and a cot. Why not kill two birds with one stone? Also, the next time some punk thinks it's a good idea to rob the local Kwik-E-Mart, maybe he'll think twice about slaving away for ten-twelves hours a day in the field, be it rain, or 120 degree sunshine. So make that three birds with one stone.
Wow, you're really serious when you say you want an American Putin, aren't you?
One of the things I've tended to grudgingly admire about the US right is its argument that by opposing any and all "collectivism" the US has managed to avoid the kinds of dicatorial and authoritarian governments and movements Europeans have had to deal with over the last few centuries. i.e., they may have it wrong but at least they take the liberal and egalitarian values of the US constitution seriously. Quotes like these really reassure me that they don't actually have a point, after all.
"rio: more pro-American and anti-Russian than Cry of the Banshee." I like the way that sounds!