Satan's Anus wrote:
I value originality very much, but I know that it's a goddamn extreme rarity in music. Very few bands have ever truly been original. Even a band like Cynic, while what they did with Focus was different at the time, the only thing really original was their blending of styles. And some would argue that wasn't even original, as bands like Nocturnus were doing the same thing back when Cynic was a straight death metal band.
What are you on about, Ken? Originality is NOT some near-untouchable state only arrived at once in a blue moon. Bands are doing original things all the time. Often the originality comes from fusing different existing styles, but so what? You make it sound like the only way somebody can be original is if they pull some bizarro world moon-music spontaneously out of their arse.
Quote:
And why is it sad if a retro band gets more replies than some band trying to be different? Again, neither of those things fucking matter. You're placing the value of context over the quality of art. Completely nonsensical.
It is sad because it indicates that what happened in music 30 years ago is still more interesting than what is happening today.
Music should be alive and ever-changing. I'm not saying I don't enjoy retro bands, because often I do. But, I will always have higher regard for bands that look to actually
create something rather than reviving something that was already created. Honestly, I can't fathom someone wouldn't understand that, let alone think it is "completely nonsensical". You are strange.