Karmakosmonaut wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
The amount of genetic material which actually is affected by race is .0001 % of the the 99.8% of genetic material which all humans share.
And we share 98.something of our genetic material with chimpansees, right? ;)
traptunderice wrote:
Differences amongst IQ scores and any kind of demonstrative evidence has probably more to do with the construction of the test or experiments or socio-economic and cultural factors.
That implies a distribution of differing talents or aptitudes according to race, doesn't it? And that our idea of intelligence is narrow and Western-culturally biased? Any thoughts on how Asians would be able to top those studies then? And socio-economic and cultural factors? I can't find the study anymore, but I'm pretty sure it took a decent cross-section of the various races from many segments of their societies. I mean, of course you're going to get wonky results if you compare Chinese coal miners' IQ with that of black universitarians and caucasian hicks. The question remains to what degree those factors can be weeded out of a representative test.
What kind of Asians are we talking about here? It's such an absurd, blanket term that covers more than half the world's population. SE Asians as in Thai, Burmese, Vietnamese?
One thing I find amusing in America is how East Asians will basically do all the activities that white people will do, from golf to poker. Granted, economic factors are at play, and I have no conclusion to make from this observation. Then of course, you have huge swaths of dorky white American guys who become obsessed with Anime, J-Rock, and of course the idea of Asian women.
