metalladdd wrote:
I know this is pretty old, but I couldn't leave this alone.
Adveser wrote:
College was too easy for me, except the circuits and electronics classes because they couldn't give me a straight answer on where the hell the energy came from.
The energy comes from the voltage difference, or electric potential difference if you want to be more accurate. Just like a boulder hanging high in the sky has a lot of potential energy due to its position and the gravitational force, charged particles have potential energy (energy of position) due to their charge and the difference in charge from one location to another. A falling boulder or a bunch of charged particles (electrons) in motion ( current) are converting what was once potential energy to kinetic energy. These forces (graviational and electromagnetic) are one of the four fundamental forces in the universe.
Adveser wrote:
The answer is always magnetic flux by the way. Power leaks from a source so tiny we've never seen it's parts. It's unbelieveable that that is the case.
Magnetic flux is the measure of how much of a magnetic field passes perpendicularly through a given area. I'm not sure where that idea came from.
Adveser wrote:
Think about this guys. The sun moves planets. We move moons. I can defy the tremendous gravity of Earth's Magnetic core with a cheap fridge magnet.
Gravity has everything to do with mass and nothing to do with electric/magnetic properties. Of the four forces I mentioned earlier, gravity is by far the weakest (electromagnetic force is orders of magnitude stronger). A cheap fridge magnet on the fridge feels a much stronger force pulling it towards the fridge door than it does from the entire Earth pulling down on it because it takes a shit-ton of stuff (lots of mass) to overpower the attraction of charged particles.
Adveser wrote:
Do you know how much power that takes? The components in a stereo are rated to handle no more than 10 watts ever, but more likely a single watt...how does that become 1000watts? The speaker powers the device.
The schools complete failure to disclose this information because they were never told themselves is frightening. Electronics operate in 4 dimensions (well, more but the 4th has more power than it is possible to use) however science is stuck in 3d and the observable world regardless that you demonstrate the functionality.
They probably didn't take many physics courses. And I don't know what dimension you are talking about. Power is not stored in dimensions. There is no inherent "power" in the three spatial dimensions or in time.
Adveser wrote:
I can't prove my speaker is providing current, so I guess when the did it the first time they thought the massive amount of useless current they fed in was the reason.
Yes you can. You can either hook it up to an ampmeter or try to power your speaker with some other type of energy (thermodynamic or mechanical).
Something is vibrating the air at a certain frequency, amplitude, etc. whenever we hear something come out of a speaker. Energy is being converted to work and that energy is coming from the motion of the particles in a wire. We are not heating up the speaker or using friction or something to provide us with the work we need to do in order to make the air move the way we observe it does.
Adveser wrote:
Bullshit. There's more current in a small speaker than a nuclear power plant exploding a million times. You just have to pull it out where it is infinite and replenishing like a current, not the self destructive system we have developed.
I don't understand what the rationale behind the first sentence is. Energy is not infinite. There is a finite amount of energy in the universe that we can tranform, but never create or destroy. And no, the force that moving charged particles experience in a nuclear explosion is far far far far far far far far greater than the force they experience from the potential difference in a wire connected to a speaker that is smaller than the Sun.
Adveser wrote:
Back in the early 1900's they explained that there were two hot poles in a circuit always. positive, negative and ground. eventually they dropped the negative (only to bring it back when they realized that electrons were negatively charged.) This left a huge mess in the theory. Basically, having that pesky, but critical extra pole made the math so difficult few could follow it. With the extra hot pole and hard to grasp nature of subatomic physics, the problem is confounding. The only answer is literally "magic" until we can build something that can see millionths of times small than atoms.
I'm not entirely sure what you are talking about but its not magic.
Please read up on 4th dimension physics as it applies to electronics. These answers show a grasp of conventional 3d physics which is easily mastered since it is so dumbed down it is practically useless. We've basically tapped out the potential of 3D physics. It's time for science to move on, but they refuse to even try to understand something they can't explain, even if they can physically see the effects of a dimension that we in no way can perceive. Op-Amps are an example. They over overunity devices, but the difference is very very tiny, so it is not usually associated with "free energy"
There is a finite amount of energy from conventional destructive/self-terminating power, but there is an unlimited amount created by vector flux in the 4th dimension. 4th dimension doesn't rely on time. The electro-magnetic force exerted by a magnet is infinite, just like a shorted wire is considered "infinite" or "immeasurable" due to it's inability to stay stable.
I tried to join the Navy, but was blacklisted after I let it slip up that I suspected they were not using Nuclear power, which has been confirmed by numerous high-ranking officers over the years involved in alternative energy projects. They have cars that can run on H2O, not that any of us will ever see such a thing.
Go read up on Tom Bearden. He can explain it better than me with far more expertise.
Again, electronics don't make since until you realize there is space that exists that you have no way of perceiving that has more influence. I do not learn by the "let's just take what Doctor so-and-so says on faith" and hammer the square peg into the round hole until we can convince ourselves it makes since. No, he has to demonstrate that his model of electricity works in every model of physics, which they can not. They need a better model of electricity that includes physics outside of 3D. Ironically, they did this from the start, but decided it was "too hard." That is pseudoscience in my book.
Electricity in certain applications can transverse time itself, until that is understood, you can't master electricity.
That is not to say 4D is all there is, but it is the next logical step for humanities understanding and since it is a step up from "our universe" it would mean a whole extra exponent of usability for us.
Learn 4D, learn how to manipulate time and the standard magnet becomes a flux capacitor. The key to this is Vector Flux.
Google Tom Bearden, download all his videos and build your own overunity device if you think he is a crackpot and see for yourself.