traptunderice wrote:
A lot of those bands you mentioned started alongside, before or slightly after Weakling.
That's precisely why I mentioned them. These bands started in the 90's or early 2000's and they had a greater influence on black metal in the 2000s than Weakling did.
Weakling, in comparison, influenced barely a handful of bands. And you state in the last four years? Ok, let's compare this to the birth of nearly every other genre/sub-genre or new wave of anything. In fact, let's compare this to the 80's and the birth of metal's primary sub-genres. During the time there was a process of bands not necessarily being
entirely influenced by each other, but who fed off each other in some way or other while taking it a step further in whatever direction they were going in.
If we look at albums like Ace of Spades (or, heck even going back to the late 70's Motörhead albums) or Welcome to Hell as foundational albums in extreme metal as far as getting the ball rolling (though really metal had technically been steamrolling in all directions since the beginning), then we also see that within a year or so many of the bands that would begin to make up heavy influences for the three big extreme metal genres had already sprung up. By '81 there was already Metal Church's Red Skies demo that arguably holds the first bone fide thrash of the 80's. At the same time you already had bands like Sodom and Hellhammer releasing demos influenced by Venom by 1982 and 1983 respectively. In just two years to a year after that these guys were already taking metal by storm along with the likes of Bathory, Slayer, Celtic Frost, Exodus and others. Funny enough, bands had more immediate influences in the age of tape trading than in the MP3 age for Weakling-influenced bands.
Jumping ahead to the later spawn of this extreme metal madness you get the Norwegian scene. And how long until that Norwegian/Scandinavian scene influenced a lot of the early American bands? Not particularly long. And in far greater numbers than a handful of shitty bands that are only recognised as anything by certain people as doing anything interesting or new (which is their supposed claim to fame).
You can't really even begin to compare that to influencing 5 shitty bands.
Weakling has not influenced anything near as massive as the amount of bands influenced by Darkthrone, Burzum or Emperor alone (even looking at that influence in the 90's), or any sub-genre of black metal. This "influence" is restricted to a fairly small group of bands.
traptunderice wrote:
However, the last four years has been dominated by bands that have taken up what Weakling was doing. Obviously, they couldn't instantly influence the whole genre but to deny that their sound hasn't shifted the sound of the genre over the last four years is ridiculous. I want to say of the bands of note in the USBM coming out now, it's mostly Weakling influenced.
The thing is that they did not and, today, do not influence the whole genre of USBM, nor have they really shifted the sound of the genre. My argument with Weakling and bands like Krallice or Liturgy is that they do not actually create any sort of "new sound" for black metal. That's like saying Kvlt of Azazel created a new bm sound by simply playing what they were trying to immitate very poorly. And that's what Weakling did. There's an obvious influence from Norwegian and earlier USBM bands...but Weakling fails at actually figuring out how to play the black metal he's trying to immitate. But this is where personality/image takes over from the music, and I think it is that "alternative image" that has influenced bands like WITTR, Liturgy and Krallice, but when it comes to music they are nothing but poor immitations of an immitation. The "image" is something new, not the music. They bring nothing new to the spectrum of black metal beyond connecting the hipster indie scene to black metal. Really the only argument for how this is supposedly something new is fans saying it makes them "feel" different than what existed before it or along side it (zomg teh emoshunz!)...but technically there is not much that is actually different going on, beyond diverging away from black metal riffs entirely (probably because they wouldn't know one if it hit them in the face)...which then makes one wonder what the fuck they are actually playing beyond poor attempts at black metal.
As far as dominating...define dominate. The thing is that there is a "niche" for this sort of thing, but outside of a handful of bands it really has little to no influence. And I wouldn't take magazines as any real indication, since they pimp a lot of idiocy.[/i]