Danmx wrote:
Open mind and inquiring heart.... really...
This review kind reminds me of when a high-brow magazine like the New Yorker reviews "Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith."
The idea is "We all know it's gonna suck anyway, so let's give the review to the person who will make fun of it the best."
Then everyone laughs and says "Great review, I know it sucks even though I haven't seen/listened to it! Hee hee! Cause it's a Star Wars Prequel/Limp Bizkit album!"
So it becomes a big parody because the reviewer obviously has an axe to grind. This is not a good album, but giving it a 10/100 is ridiculous. That's like giving a girl a 1 out of 10 on HotorNot.com. She'd have to be 300 pounds, missing an arm, and look like King Hippo to warrant a score like that.
Limp Bizkit is not a good band, but this album is not THAT bad.
If you're going to give a review, give a real review, not a celebration of Durst hating.
voxmonster wrote:
Many other sites gave this album positive reviews. I'm just saying. I haven't heard this album, but the time you put into hating this album is puzzling. Have you liked any Limp Bizkit album? If not, why do a completely biased review? Why waste the space you could have used to do a legitimate review? Why review a band's new album if you hate the band anyway? A for effort, but why even put forth the effort? I guess cause you figured out a cool Durst like rap review. Did this site force you to do this review or something? Whatever the reason, this review is a waste of my time and yours.
Frigid should love this because you guys are making him look really good right now
