Metal Reviews

You were the one to first bring America in like a badge of honor or something. What's more, those were obvious puns which you and the masked überval took seriously.

Look at your avatar. You can be a Francophile, but as soon as one of my countrymen mentions the US, you feel you have something you gotta say?
Who the fuck do you think you are? You have a long history of talking trash about the US, pun my ass. You think you are fooling anyone? The usual passive - agressive bullshit game.

My avatar is a joke. I don't care about France or French people that much. Nor do I hate americans as much as you might have thought I did. I just can stand arrogance and narrow-mindedness, two things the most active americans on the political and societal issues seem to have in unlimited supply.

USA? more like US-gay. HAH

Again with the talking trash about Americans. You can't stand arrogance? Look in the fucking mirror, clown.

Fight arrogance with arrogance, cunt.

You're a joke.
You talk about narrowmindedness and arrogance, two of your defining traits. The way you constantly attempt to charcterize the US is a perfect example of this.

There is some debate on whether "marriage" is a right or not; homosexuals are allowed to have a civil union, so it's really just symbolic at this point.

Personally I don't see why gays would want a religious marriage within an institution that persistently demonizes them and their lifestyles. It would be like a Jew complaining that he can't get a Nazi funeral or something.

On the issue of marriage, I think one of the sticking points is the religious aspect of it all, but really, as I don't really care about this either way, I'm not too well versed on the matter so I can't really comment on it with any real authority. Still, if a civil union is a legal ceremony in which two people enjoy all the benefits (I believe; again, I'm not an expert on this), than I don't see what the issue really is, beyond symbolism.

I'm not a fan of the idea of marriage itself in the first place, but I can see why some people might want to ritually formalize what they believe to be an expression of their love, and I understand that in many cases, there are financial benefits. If these are met with a civil union case, then, well, I see two options. Because marriage has a somewhat religious connotation, either we remove the religious aspect of marriage entirely, thereby leaving no reason for gays not to get married, or we consider marriage to be entirely religious, and therefore entirely subjective, again leaving no reason for gays not to get married.
A third option would be to do away with the institution of marriage anyway and simply have civil unions for everyone.

Because gays want to be able to do everything that straight people can. Marriage in most cases just doesn't work, as they have a much less monogamous lifestyle than straight people.

Therefore I say: allow LGBT marriage, prohibit LGBT divorce. Everybody wins!

I'm pretty sure that's not true.

Then obviously you haven't been around gays. Which I'm pretty sure is not true.

The gays I know are just about as promiscuous as the rest of the people I know. But then, maybe I just know a lot of promiscuous straight people.

Yes you should.

Actually more like Gaynada HAH!!!!!

There is s fourth option: leave it be.
As long as a civil union affords the same benefits as marriage, I don't see what the problem is. If a gay couple are religious and want a religious ceremony, that is something that may have to be re-analyzed on their part if said religion does not condone homosexuality.

That's what you've been letting on about yourself, actually