emperorblackdoom wrote:
dead1 wrote:
emperorblackdoom wrote:
You are the one pointing to the "masses" as your support, which is pandering to the lowest common denominator.
Now you've lost me. What do you mean by pointing to the "masses."
Also I had mentioned a whole heap of DM bands - hence I thought you were referring to DM.
By your arguments in favor of "classics" as metal albums that did well in the mainstream.
I think two tiers of classics, those within the mainstream and those only within the metal community, as Stefan suggested, is a fair system.
But you suggest that mainstream acceptance is a fundamental element of "classic" status, no?
You misunderstand me.
I was merely responding to the contention that classic albums with mainstream acceptance might not be that relevant to metal anymore. I think they are.
I also think that classics exist with Metal - albums that are classic in context of heavy metal evolution or are simply fucking awesome and generally accepted by all as such.
E.g. Repulsion's Horrified or Dark Angel's Darkness Descends are as classic as Metallica's Master of Puppets or Iron Maiden's The Number of the Beast in the
context of the metal genre.
I've been pushing this line in the Classics section of the forum for some time.
Hence I am in complete agreement with Frenchie.