Metal Reviews

Newest and Best Metal Reviews!
FAQ :: Search :: Members :: Groups :: Register
Login
It is currently Tue Jul 01, 2025 11:11 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4   
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2012 9:02 am 
Offline
Einherjar
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 9:15 am
Posts: 2232
Location: Flanders, Southern Netherlands
I'm not really a fan of the more modern Mustangs, but good luck with your project of course. Although I must say "70.000 miles, hardly ever driven" sounds like a contradiction to my European ears :huh:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2012 9:16 am 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:23 pm
Posts: 7726
Location: One day closer to death
Karmakosmonaut wrote:
I'm not really a fan of the more modern Mustangs, but good luck with your project of course. Although I must say "70.000 miles, hardly ever driven" sounds like a contradiction to my European ears :huh:


I was actually looking for a Trans-Am, but couldn't find anything in my price range with less than 190,00 miles... in America 70,000 miles on a 15 year old machine is considered pristine... hell I commute 100 miles a day to work. My state alone (Cali) is larger than many European countries, so I can undersatnd why 70,000 sounds like a lot to a European.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 3:45 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:15 pm
Posts: 13700
Location: Cincinnati OH
cry of the banshee wrote:
Karmakosmonaut wrote:
I'm not really a fan of the more modern Mustangs, but good luck with your project of course. Although I must say "70.000 miles, hardly ever driven" sounds like a contradiction to my European ears :huh:


I was actually looking for a Trans-Am, but couldn't find anything in my price range with less than 190,00 miles... in America 70,000 miles on a 15 year old machine is considered pristine... hell I commute 100 miles a day to work. My state alone (Cali) is larger than many European countries, so I can undersatnd why 70,000 sounds like a lot to a European.
I had a '93 Trans Am a few years ago and was totally pushing 170,000 miles on it. Got rid of it as the transmission was going out. I read your post as if the '95 was one of the old fox body models and got super excited. But '95s are past that? Sad. But still pretty fucking awesome. Ohio highways would be a waste for all that power. Too many staties.

_________________
http://www.last.fm/user/traptunderice


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 7:34 pm 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:23 pm
Posts: 7726
Location: One day closer to death
traptunderice wrote:
cry of the banshee wrote:
Karmakosmonaut wrote:
I'm not really a fan of the more modern Mustangs, but good luck with your project of course. Although I must say "70.000 miles, hardly ever driven" sounds like a contradiction to my European ears :huh:


I was actually looking for a Trans-Am, but couldn't find anything in my price range with less than 190,00 miles... in America 70,000 miles on a 15 year old machine is considered pristine... hell I commute 100 miles a day to work. My state alone (Cali) is larger than many European countries, so I can undersatnd why 70,000 sounds like a lot to a European.
I had a '93 Trans Am a few years ago and was totally pushing 170,000 miles on it. Got rid of it as the transmission was going out. I read your post as if the '95 was one of the old fox body models and got super excited. But '95s are past that? Sad. But still pretty fucking awesome. Ohio highways would be a waste for all that power. Too many staties.


Nice. The dude that is going to change my gears has an '88 Fox body Mustang; the fox body is nice, but I always preferred the SN95 slightly (an uncommon opinion, I know)... more streamlined, somehow.
Yes, the last Fox body was in 92 - 93 if my memory serves me correctly, and the '95 was the last of the true HO 5.0's.
I know a dude that has a 1968 Mach II fastback with a Windsor 351 just rotting away in his garage; hasn't run since the early 90s, but he refuses to sell it. It's heartbreaking.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 11:23 pm 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:26 am
Posts: 2491
The Guide V1.0

Quote:
Intro - first of all, this is not a system for beginners and it assumes you are extremely familiar with the terminology and function of the organs used in vocal production. It assumes the organs that are not mentioned are known and employed successfully and it assumes excellent breathing technique.

The uvula / the soft palette - this is the main component to the vocal system. Directly coupled with the vocal opening, this provides exact placement of airflow. Once controlled masterfully, the exact amount of air pressure goes to the nasal cavity and the hard palette simultaneously while vibrating the soft palette in sympathy with the diaphragm. Speaking of which, the diaphragm should be used to vibrate the entire larynx "shell" sympathetically as a function of the bass fundamental.

The larynx - secondary to the soft palette and hard palette. This will collect air reflected back from the hard palette, trap it in an indefinite loop and from there, the vocal folds open and close to allow freedom of movement from the airflow. Needless to say there is also still the original source of airflow from the diaphragm flowing as well. The aim is to trap the air and have the current flow as slowly as possible as it replaces backflow of air in a circular "forward" motion while driving the airflow downwards into the larynx.

The above describes both a "chest" and "head" voice scenario depending on the amount of resonance added to the organs and frequencies you would like to accentuate. The head voice benefits from a larynx boost, while the chestier voice does not sound optimal this way. One would be wise not to even make the distinction at all and would build the main voice as a seamless type with many varying options for tone, weights, clarity and such.

The falsetto folds - to engage these folds, the inner folds of the larynx should be narrowed, relaxed, and uniform, providing current to move more unimpeded than normally. The folds should move slightly, but not much. The main difference is that the airflow is reversed in circular direction and the airflow should be allowed far more current to flow upwards with much less retention of airflow in the larynx. The false folds once engaged should be matched to the width of the folds and slightly toed in to replace the function of the vocal opening. Should move "back and upwards"

The whistle - if you have the above mastered and can go back and forth with relative ease, obtaining the whistle register is just a matter of mastering the gating action (abduction) of the vocal opening. Work the false folds for double whistles.

Integration - the main focus of this method is that all three voicings (main, falsetto, whistle) are always employed in subtle degrees. There can be wildly different voicings, but there should not be three distinct voices that are incompatible with each other and have to be "spaced apart" to be workable. This system is intended to be integrated into various overtone singing methods.

Special note - the proper employment of these techniques may require you to physically move your internal voice organs within your throat. The muscles within are not always aligned or developed to control the entire voice. I will not offer any advice in this regard and discourage you to do so. Doing so may cause injury of a life-threatening nature or may cause your epiglottis to not function properly presenting a choking hazard or liquids to get into your lungs. Moving the muscles or vocal organs may also force too much strength where it is unwanted and could also immediately rupture vocal folds. This is here for full disclosure that it is possible to gain maximum human range of 10-4000hz vocal range only and only a qualified medical professional should be pursued in this regard.

End notes - use at your own risk. Sing sitting down with pillows nearby and immediately do a hard mouth breathe if everything goes black suddenly. No i don't know why your body may feel numb and tingly with your vision vibrating or any other weird effects such as your skin becoming electrically conductive or you feel like you are made of lightning. Don't take this warning lightly. Not to be used while using ungrounded, unshielded or unbalanced cabling. Not responsible for equipment damages. Notes on vocal fry and guttural or harsh singing in the future as well as schematics.


And a sample. not perfect. Probably a lot of mistakes from me trying to hit two vocal harmonies at once though. This is just an outtake from me practicing. Original recording (C) Scarlett records, for demonstration purposes only. The band nor label endorse this in any fashion and nothing about it should be misconstrued as representing their mix, master or performances.

http://www.mediafire.com/?69zzv8028g5ox1t

_________________
I love the Queen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 3:24 am 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:15 pm
Posts: 13700
Location: Cincinnati OH
cry of the banshee wrote:
traptunderice wrote:
cry of the banshee wrote:
Karmakosmonaut wrote:
I'm not really a fan of the more modern Mustangs, but good luck with your project of course. Although I must say "70.000 miles, hardly ever driven" sounds like a contradiction to my European ears :huh:


I was actually looking for a Trans-Am, but couldn't find anything in my price range with less than 190,00 miles... in America 70,000 miles on a 15 year old machine is considered pristine... hell I commute 100 miles a day to work. My state alone (Cali) is larger than many European countries, so I can undersatnd why 70,000 sounds like a lot to a European.
I had a '93 Trans Am a few years ago and was totally pushing 170,000 miles on it. Got rid of it as the transmission was going out. I read your post as if the '95 was one of the old fox body models and got super excited. But '95s are past that? Sad. But still pretty fucking awesome. Ohio highways would be a waste for all that power. Too many staties.


Nice. The dude that is going to change my gears has an '88 Fox body Mustang; the fox body is nice, but I always preferred the SN95 slightly (an uncommon opinion, I know)... more streamlined, somehow.
Yes, the last Fox body was in 92 - 93 if my memory serves me correctly, and the '95 was the last of the true HO 5.0's.
I know a dude that has a 1968 Mach II fastback with a Windsor 351 just rotting away in his garage; hasn't run since the early 90s, but he refuses to sell it. It's heartbreaking.
Ahhh, the 5.0... So fun. Brother used to have a '90 and he used to really get on it when I was a kid. I truly fell in love with cars riding with him. I never got too knowledgeable but I really love the experience of driving and having fun.

People unwilling to put the time in classics make me sad. My brother worked over a '70 Chevelle and I used to have so much fun helping and my uncle used to have a '67 Cobra.

_________________
http://www.last.fm/user/traptunderice


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 3:41 am 
Offline
Metal King
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:49 pm
Posts: 1150
Location: Toronto
Adveser wrote:
The Guide V1.0

Quote:
Intro - first of all, this is not a system for beginners and it assumes you are extremely familiar with the terminology and function of the organs used in vocal production. It assumes the organs that are not mentioned are known and employed successfully and it assumes excellent breathing technique.

The uvula / the soft palette - this is the main component to the vocal system. Directly coupled with the vocal opening, this provides exact placement of airflow. Once controlled masterfully, the exact amount of air pressure goes to the nasal cavity and the hard palette simultaneously while vibrating the soft palette in sympathy with the diaphragm. Speaking of which, the diaphragm should be used to vibrate the entire larynx "shell" sympathetically as a function of the bass fundamental.

The larynx - secondary to the soft palette and hard palette. This will collect air reflected back from the hard palette, trap it in an indefinite loop and from there, the vocal folds open and close to allow freedom of movement from the airflow. Needless to say there is also still the original source of airflow from the diaphragm flowing as well. The aim is to trap the air and have the current flow as slowly as possible as it replaces backflow of air in a circular "forward" motion while driving the airflow downwards into the larynx.

The above describes both a "chest" and "head" voice scenario depending on the amount of resonance added to the organs and frequencies you would like to accentuate. The head voice benefits from a larynx boost, while the chestier voice does not sound optimal this way. One would be wise not to even make the distinction at all and would build the main voice as a seamless type with many varying options for tone, weights, clarity and such.

The falsetto folds - to engage these folds, the inner folds of the larynx should be narrowed, relaxed, and uniform, providing current to move more unimpeded than normally. The folds should move slightly, but not much. The main difference is that the airflow is reversed in circular direction and the airflow should be allowed far more current to flow upwards with much less retention of airflow in the larynx. The false folds once engaged should be matched to the width of the folds and slightly toed in to replace the function of the vocal opening. Should move "back and upwards"

The whistle - if you have the above mastered and can go back and forth with relative ease, obtaining the whistle register is just a matter of mastering the gating action (abduction) of the vocal opening. Work the false folds for double whistles.

Integration - the main focus of this method is that all three voicings (main, falsetto, whistle) are always employed in subtle degrees. There can be wildly different voicings, but there should not be three distinct voices that are incompatible with each other and have to be "spaced apart" to be workable. This system is intended to be integrated into various overtone singing methods.

Special note - the proper employment of these techniques may require you to physically move your internal voice organs within your throat. The muscles within are not always aligned or developed to control the entire voice. I will not offer any advice in this regard and discourage you to do so. Doing so may cause injury of a life-threatening nature or may cause your epiglottis to not function properly presenting a choking hazard or liquids to get into your lungs. Moving the muscles or vocal organs may also force too much strength where it is unwanted and could also immediately rupture vocal folds. This is here for full disclosure that it is possible to gain maximum human range of 10-4000hz vocal range only and only a qualified medical professional should be pursued in this regard.

End notes - use at your own risk. Sing sitting down with pillows nearby and immediately do a hard mouth breathe if everything goes black suddenly. No i don't know why your body may feel numb and tingly with your vision vibrating or any other weird effects such as your skin becoming electrically conductive or you feel like you are made of lightning. Don't take this warning lightly. Not to be used while using ungrounded, unshielded or unbalanced cabling. Not responsible for equipment damages. Notes on vocal fry and guttural or harsh singing in the future as well as schematics.


And a sample. not perfect. Probably a lot of mistakes from me trying to hit two vocal harmonies at once though. This is just an outtake from me practicing. Original recording (C) Scarlett records, for demonstration purposes only. The band nor label endorse this in any fashion and nothing about it should be misconstrued as representing their mix, master or performances.

http://www.mediafire.com/?69zzv8028g5ox1t


Okay then.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 4:26 am 
Offline
Ist Krieg
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 7:40 am
Posts: 13758
Location: Canada
can hardly hear u in the sample


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 5:18 am 
Offline
Destroyer ov Spambots
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 12:28 am
Posts: 3035
Location: Paris, France
noodles wrote:
can hardly hear u in the sample


Or, he's become extremely good.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 10:00 am 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:26 am
Posts: 2491
My falsetto before the fadeout is hard to hear but the rest was noticeably louder when I muted and soloed it. Doesn't hurt that my voice is becoming a clone of Tyranti's, which was the plan (?) Try walking away from the speakers. My voice will mysteriously get louder and louder in the mix the further one is from the sound source.

_________________
I love the Queen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 10:24 pm 
Offline
Einherjar

Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:26 am
Posts: 2491
A negatively biased D4 and shitloads of overtones that form a sort of "supernote" which can be seen as the notes combine, miost obviously around 15Khz. The microphone was coaxed into exceeding it's bandwidth limit of around 11.5Khz. Notice the DC current that is apparently added below 60hz. The Taken from the sustained note from the end of the chorus of "A Rite of Passage."

Image

_________________
I love the Queen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2012 8:24 am 
Offline
Einherjar
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 9:15 am
Posts: 2232
Location: Flanders, Southern Netherlands
Adveser wrote:
My falsetto before the fadeout is hard to hear but the rest was noticeably louder when I muted and soloed it. Doesn't hurt that my voice is becoming a clone of Tyranti's, which was the plan (?) Try walking away from the speakers. My voice will mysteriously get louder and louder in the mix the further one is from the sound source.

I heard it alright, I turned down my speakers a bit to hear you better, and while you do have some range (at least enough for this song) you were off-key about half the time. Theorise all you want about the technicalities of singing, but as for the practical side of things: stick to the shower.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4   


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group