Metal Reviews

Newest and Best Metal Reviews!
FAQ :: Search :: Members :: Groups :: Register
Login
It is currently Fri May 23, 2025 10:07 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Dissection - Maha Kali (#2617)
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 2:00 pm 
You're welcome to comment on:
Quote:
Image
Dissection - Maha Kali
Melodic Death Metal
Quoted: no quote


Click here to see the review.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 5:40 pm 
Offline
Banned Mallcore Kiddie

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 10:48 am
Posts: 26
I think I'm gonna cry.

I was looking foward to the new Dissection material a lot but it looks like I've set myself up for disappointment.

I hope their new full length album will be an improvement over this, if it's as bad as you say it is.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 5:44 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 5:34 am
Posts: 1721
Location: Mexico City
There's a sample at their website; judge their "rebirth" yourself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 5:54 pm 
Offline
Metal Lord
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 419
Location: Riga, Latvia
deathkvlt wrote:
When thinking of the second wave of Black Metal, the big names immediately jump to mind: Burzum, Darkthrone, Emperor, Mayhem, Ulver, Immortal and of course, the mighty Swedes, Dissection.


I never considered Dissection as a BM milestone. A great band, yes, with an awesome album (Storm Of The Light's Bane) and a good one (The Somberlane). Excellent and evil main themes, original riffs (that sometimes remind me Satyricon :wink:). But that's not a legendary band, imo.

deathkvlt wrote:
And there are bands I never really cared for (Mayhem) and that I don’t care for now.


I consider old Mayhem to be dead also. I like the new one, but it isn't the same band that released DMDS, Deathcrush and Live in Leipzig. It has nothing to do with the second/thrid wave of BM (maybe except bandmembers).

And one more thing, about BM waves: I thought (correct me if I'm wrong) the first one was early-mid 80's, second - mid-late 80's, third - early-mid 90's and fourth - nowadays BM. And you added Ulver (93) and Emperor (91) to the 2nd wave... So who's making a mistake?? :?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:01 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:41 am
Posts: 3731
Location: Veldhoven - The Netherlands
I thought the one that you call first wasn't really a wave (more like a rimpling in the water). I don't know shit about waves though, so don't listen to me...

Nevertheless, this song was a true dissapointment. The quality of the older dissection can be debatable, but despite the outcome, the older work of the band has truly been a cornerstone for the more melodic and melancholic black metal!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:08 pm 
Offline
Metal Lord
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 419
Location: Riga, Latvia
Gast1 wrote:
I thought the one that you call first wasn't really a wave (more like a rimpling in the water). I don't know shit about waves though, so don't listen to me...


:)

Venom, Hellhammer, Celtic Frost, Bathory... rimpling in the water? :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:08 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 5:34 am
Posts: 1721
Location: Mexico City
Desolate wrote:
deathkvlt wrote:
When thinking of the second wave of Black Metal, the big names immediately jump to mind: Burzum, Darkthrone, Emperor, Mayhem, Ulver, Immortal and of course, the mighty Swedes, Dissection.


I never considered Dissection as a BM milestone. A great band, yes, with an awesome album (Storm Of The Light's Bane) and a good one (The Somberlane). Excellent and evil main themes, original riffs (that sometimes remind me Satyricon :wink:). But that's not a legendary band, imo.


Some people consider Dissection a milestone, some don't, as simple as that, plus I never said milestone, I said the big names jump to mind, IMO Dissection is a big name.

Desolate wrote:
deathkvlt wrote:
And there are bands I never really cared for (Mayhem) and that I don’t care for now.


I consider old Mayhem to be dead also. I like the new one, but it isn't the same band that released DMDS, Deathcrush and Live in Leipzig. It has nothing to do with the second/thrid wave of BM (maybe except bandmembers).


So.....? Call them a new band or the same band, it's the same for me, I don't give a fuck about (new or old) Mayhem.

Desolate wrote:
And one more thing, about BM waves: I thought (correct me if I'm wrong) the first one was early-mid 80's, second - mid-late 80's, third - early-mid 90's and fourth - nowadays BM. And you added Ulver (93) and Emperor (91) to the 2nd wave... So who's making a mistake?? :?


Once again it depends on how you do it, I didn't know there was a standard for this, and the one I see used the most is the one I use:

1st: Venom, Bathory, Celtic Frost bla bla bla
2nd: early/mid 90's
3rd: Nowadays BM.

Thanks for the comments Desolate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:11 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:41 am
Posts: 3731
Location: Veldhoven - The Netherlands
Ow yes woops, I mean the same thing as Daniel about the waves... I was confused about the years for some time...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:32 pm 
Offline
Metal Lord
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 419
Location: Riga, Latvia
deathkvlt wrote:
Desolate wrote:
deathkvlt wrote:
When thinking of the second wave of Black Metal, the big names immediately jump to mind: Burzum, Darkthrone, Emperor, Mayhem, Ulver, Immortal and of course, the mighty Swedes, Dissection.


I never considered Dissection as a BM milestone. A great band, yes, with an awesome album (Storm Of The Light's Bane) and a good one (The Somberlane). Excellent and evil main themes, original riffs (that sometimes remind me Satyricon :wink:). But that's not a legendary band, imo.


Some people consider Dissection a milestone, some don't, as simple as that, plus I never said milestone, I said the big names jump to mind, IMO Dissection is a big name.


K, got that.

deathkvlt wrote:
Desolate wrote:
deathkvlt wrote:
And there are bands I never really cared for (Mayhem) and that I don’t care for now.


I consider old Mayhem to be dead also. I like the new one, but it isn't the same band that released DMDS, Deathcrush and Live in Leipzig. It has nothing to do with the second/thrid wave of BM (maybe except bandmembers).


So.....? Call them a new band or the same band, it's the same for me, I don't give a fuck about (new or old) Mayhem.


I thought you were stating that Mayhem are still alive. Got that too.

deathkvlt wrote:
Desolate wrote:
And one more thing, about BM waves: I thought (correct me if I'm wrong) the first one was early-mid 80's, second - mid-late 80's, third - early-mid 90's and fourth - nowadays BM. And you added Ulver (93) and Emperor (91) to the 2nd wave... So who's making a mistake?? :?


Once again it depends on how you do it, I didn't know there was a standard for this, and the one I see used the most is the one I use:

1st: Venom, Bathory, Celtic Frost bla bla bla
2nd: early/mid 90's
3rd: Nowadays BM.

Thanks for the comments Desolate.


I saw some kind of standards on the web and the author stated it's "accepted" worldwide.

No, thank you for your reviews :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:37 pm 
Offline
Svartalfar

Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 6:14 am
Posts: 37
uhh, you heard one new song, and you are throwing a shit-fit already? Come on, just wait until they release a full album. Then you can start bitching about BM being dead or whatever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:52 pm 
Offline
MetalReviews Staff
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 5:34 am
Posts: 1721
Location: Mexico City
aallgod wrote:
uhh, you heard one new song, and you are throwing a shit-fit already? Come on, just wait until they release a full album. Then you can start bitching about BM being dead or whatever.


Daniel wrote:
Maybe it is too early to speculate, specially considering that this is only one new song, but if their full-length is like this song, read my words: Dissection is dead.


First read, then you can start bitching about my reviews. Plus, I never said BM is dead, I said that all the second wave big names where dead.

Well elaborated and polite comments are always accepted (Desolate), even if they're negative, SPECIALLY if they're negative, but un-polite bitch-talkin without even reading the reviews first is for cunts.

www.kerrang.com <------------ There you can bitchtalk all you want.

Metal Reviews is for smart, well based discussion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 7:44 pm 
Offline
Metal Lord

Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 5:27 pm
Posts: 602
Location: Augusta Taurinorum, Italia
Usually I'm not picky at all... but this sucks. Hard.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:11 pm 
+1!

This disc should have a warning on the outside, saying: "Warning! Major suckage inside! Listen at own risk!"


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Still a great song
PostPosted: Tue Feb 22, 2005 5:31 pm 
I can agree with all who claim that Maha Kali is nothing compared to any creation from the first era of Dissection. But I disagree with all who claims that Maha Kali is in anyway a poor song.

As a result of the the Maha Kali MCD I do not eagerly look forward to Dissection's full length album because of the fact that I know it will be a dissapointment compared to erlier Dissection.
But deep within me I know that if I don't compare it to early Dissection, it will be an awesome release.

Then we have the fact that the vocals och the guitars on Maha Kali is recorded behind the walls of Hall prison in Sweden.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:32 pm 
Offline
Metal Lord

Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 5:27 pm
Posts: 602
Location: Augusta Taurinorum, Italia
I wish I could take it like that too... sadly, this single still sucks in my ears, even if I pretend it's not Dissection.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:40 pm 
Offline
Einherjar
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 4:30 am
Posts: 2118
Location: Seremban, Malaysia
lame shit


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:45 pm 
Offline
Einherjar
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 4:30 am
Posts: 2118
Location: Seremban, Malaysia
deathkvlt wrote:
aallgod wrote:
uhh, you heard one new song, and you are throwing a shit-fit already? Come on, just wait until they release a full album. Then you can start bitching about BM being dead or whatever.


Daniel wrote:
Maybe it is too early to speculate, specially considering that this is only one new song, but if their full-length is like this song, read my words: Dissection is dead.


First read, then you can start bitching about my reviews. Plus, I never said BM is dead, I said that all the second wave big names where dead.

Well elaborated and polite comments are always accepted (Desolate), even if they're negative, SPECIALLY if they're negative, but un-polite bitch-talkin without even reading the reviews first is for cunts.

www.kerrang.com <------------ There you can bitchtalk all you want.

Metal Reviews is for smart, well based discussion.


IN YOUR FACE!!! haha! good one deathkvlt


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group