OldSchool wrote:
mentalmark wrote:
3. Dahmer, Zodiac & Gein. Glorfied serial killers who get a movie made about their exploits. If you can't become a superstar, may as well get into films the other way.
Don't put the serial killers in the same hat with mass murderers. Totally different types of perpetrators, different drives, different causes, different methods, everything. Hard to say which one is worst. Serial killers are more sinister though.
I can understand where you're coming from, but essentially what I was trying to convey - Mass murderers or serial killers - there's a back story, a drive, a motive. Doesn't matter how technical you want to be about the differences, they're still people who kill shit loads of others! When whatever back story, drive or motive comes to light, someone out there will take that, turn it into a story, shoot a film and make bucks from it.
That poises a further question on the lines a Star Wars quote - 'who's the more evil? The devil or the demon who glorifies him for his own profit?'
If having severely sick fuck heads ain't bad enough, having them glorified surely must influence other unbalanced weirdos to try and martyr themselves in history by taking that route of killing people. Does it matter whether it be by kidnap and torture to death as opposed to walking down the high street with a semi-automatic blazing? Still gonna make news and give the media a juicy money maker. The further question then is how many can they kill before they get taken out? More people = more notoriety?