marty@metalreviews wrote:
Jeff@Metalreviews wrote:
Marty, I'm confused....why quote the "Bomber" review and not this one? I think it deserves some type of score as well......
Overkill was already reviewed as a classic so I didn't quote it. The whole point of even including the Overkill re-issue was to point out the bonus material (19 tracks on the second CD). It seems that no-one really cares about that and just wants to flame for me even reviewing it. There's 4 re-issues that came out at the same time a couple of months ago. I have them all and why should I not at least mention the Overkill one rather than leave it out? It would be different if I re-posted it as a classic but I didn't...I also didn't quote it either. Adding it to the other weekly reviews along with the review of Bomber seemed like a pretty innocent thing to do .....I guess the forum trolls have nothibng better to do with their time....by the way Ace Of Spades us up next week for a classic.....anyone have a problem with that???
Yes, considering there's no reviews for most of Motorhead's albums. What of 1916? What of Orgasmatron? Another Perfect Day? Why review what has been done already?
And you "didn't see" my point about the bonus tracks. You barely mentioned them, at least go through them track by track!
Forum trolls?!
Edit: No review for AOS yet, so that's OK. Still think
Bomber and
Overkill reviews are pointless....